Hi, today we had a very productive discussion on the charters on the telecon, and I am about to post the revised charters to the list. * We decided on a 3-2 vote on the call that the working group should be SAGA-CORE-WG. * We intend to send the charters to the GFSG on Friday morning so they have sufficient time to digest them before their next meeting. So please get comments back asap. * There was discussion as to whether the SAGA-RG should define the process by which the abstract SIDL specification maps to language specific bindings. E.g., for procedural languages this would define the naming of constructors and the way in which overloaded functions get named. The argument for is that this is being implicitly done during the implementation phase in the SAGA-CORE-WG anyway, and we want to make sure that it is consistent across future SAGA-RGs. The argument against was that it is more documents to produce. We came to no consensus on this issue and would appreciate any comments from the wider group. Ok, I'm going to follow up with the latest charters in seperate mails so we can discuss. Cheers, Tom