27 Apr
2006
27 Apr
'06
4:37 p.m.
My opinion: we should define constness in the language bindings. Reason: not all languages support const Counter-argument: state constness of objects and parameters should not vary from one binding to the next. Well, that can also be solved by synchronizing the bindings in terms of constness. Cheers, Andre. Quoting [Andre Merzky] (Apr 20 2006):
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 18:55:33 +0200 From: Andre Merzky <andre@merzky.net> To: SAGA RG <saga-rg@ggf.org> Subject: ISSUE 108
108) explain why we don't specify constness. Or should we? - OPEN, URGENT
Obvious again. Opinions?
Cheers, Andre. -- "So much time, so little to do..." -- Garfield