On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 01:47:02PM +0200, Andre Merzky wrote:
I think I disagree here. For one thing, as far as I understood there is no convention which holds for C++ in general, or for C in general etc.
Bad enough for C++...
Second, that would lead to semantical differences in the different languages. I guess we don't want that. E.g., the following code would then possibly behave differently in C++/Java:
+-----------------------------------------------------------------+ saga::job_description jd_1 = my_job.get_job_description (); saga::job_description jd_2 = jd_1;
jd_2.set_attribute ("SAGA_Host", "localhost"); +-----------------------------------------------------------------+
The state of jd_2 would differ in C++ and Java then, and I'd think we would like to avoid that, don't we? If we allow that, you basically have to re-learn (small parts of) the semantics for SAGA for each language...
Who cares? Again, this is a language detail, NOT SAGA. It is more important that SAGA doesn't prescibe deviations from "the usual things" in a language. BTW: if you write a program in which this difference is important, your program is badly written. If you are the kind of programmer who makes use of these details, you know that you have to read the docs of your language binding (or even implementation) to find out... I don't care, I don't write (such ;-) programs... Thilo -- Thilo Kielmann http://www.cs.vu.nl/~kielmann/