Oh, right - sorry for the mixup!
Thanks, Andre.
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Kawai Yutaka
<yutaka.kawai.kek(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Andre,
>
> Sorry for my late response. Actually, I did not attend OGF30. I think you
> mean our slide is the one Yoshiyuki and Go presented at OGF30, right?
>
> Regards,
> Yutaka
>
> 2010/12/2 Andre Merzky <andre(a)merzky.net>
>>
>> Many thanks! :-)
>>
>> Best, Andre.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Sylvain Reynaud
>> <Sylvain.Reynaud(a)in2p3.fr> wrote:
>> > Hi Andre,
>> >
>> > Please find our slides attached to this mail.
>> >
>> > Best regards,
>> > Sylvain
>> >
>> >
>> > Andre Merzky a écrit :
>> >>
>> >> Hi Sylvain,
>> >>
>> >> thanks for the follow up! Very much appreciated.
>> >>
>> >> FWIW, would it be possible to circulate your slides from OGF30?
>> >> Yutaka, would it be possible for you to circulate your slides as well?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Sylvain Reynaud
>> >> <Sylvain.Reynaud(a)in2p3.fr> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>>
>> >>> Hi Andre,
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> This mail is to answer some questions you asked during OGF SAGA
>> >>> session.
>> >>>
>> >>> 1) usage of monitoring in namespace package :
>> >>> I said that monitoring was used for implementing a progress-bar for
>> >>> file
>> >>> transfer in a GUI. In fact, the monitoring is done through a
>> >>> (non-standardized) metric of task, as you suspected it.
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> Yes, that makes sense. That invites the question if one should not
>> >> make the metrics on task extensible...
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>>
>> >>> 2) usage of permissions in namespace package :
>> >>> As I said during the session, this feature is used and very important
>> >>> for
>> >>> several JSAGA users. However, simple unix-like permissions would be
>> >>> enough
>> >>> for these use-cases, and anyway we don't have any adaptor supporting
>> >>> advanced ACL.
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> That is good to know :-)
>> >>
>> >> Thanks, best regards,
>> >>
>> >> Andre.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>>
>> >>> As agreed upon during the SAGA Interop Feast, I have made a patch
>> >>> based
>> >>> on
>> >>> the new version 1.1 of the reference Java Bindings for SAGA, in order
>> >>> to
>> >>> enable coexistence of several Java implementations of SAGA as shown in
>> >>> our
>> >>> demo. I will send this patch in a separate mail.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Best regards,
>> >>> Sylvain
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Andre Merzky a écrit :
>> >>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Hi all,
>> >>>> we have the following sessions scheduled for OGF30:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Wednesday, October 27 Session 1:
>> >>>> Time: 11:00 am - 12:30 pm Title: SAGA - General
>> >>>> Discussion
>> >>>> Summary: State of the SAGA-nation, and open discussion
>> >>>> Agenda: - agenda bashing for all SAGA sessions
>> >>>> - intro
>> >>>> - state of the SAGA-nation, open discussion
>> >>>> - open discussion
>> >>>> - document business
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Session 2:
>> >>>> Time: 1:30 pm - 3:00 pm Title: SAGA Interop Feast
>> >>>> Summary: showcase SAGA based access to a variety of middlewares
>> >>>> Agenda: - TBA
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Session 3:
>> >>>> Time: 3:30 pm - 5:00 pm Title: SAGA - Working Session
>> >>>> Summary: SAGA WG session
>> >>>> Agenda: - overspill from interop feast
>> >>>> - discussion current work and future steps
>> >>>> - EMI/PGI/GIN relations
>> >>>> - relations to other OGF groups
>> >>>> - discussion of public comments
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Thursday, October 28
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Session 4:
>> >>>> Time: 10:30 am - 12:00 pm Title: Application level Grid
>> >>>> Interoperation Now (A GIN)
>> >>>> Summary: Synchronizing of the interop efforts in the GIN and SAGA
>> >>>> groups. Joint group session
>> >>>> Agenda: - TBA. - SAGA demonstrations for the GIN
>> >>>> community
>> >>>> - GIN demonstrations for the SAGA community
>> >>>> - discussion
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Please note that session 2 and 4 have some overlap in scope.
>> >>>> Ideally, we see the same demos in both sessions (from the saga side
>> >>>> at least), but in session 2 discuss them in respect to SAGA
>> >>>> development and specification, and in session 4 try to find a common
>> >>>> denominator with the GIN efforts.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Please let me know if that all makes sense, if you like to add items
>> >>>> to the agendas, etc.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Best, Andre.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Nothing is ever easy...
>
>
--
Nothing is ever easy...