After many minor revisions I believe this is as good as it will get.
Unless I hear objections I will resubmit to the OGF editor on Monday
morning. If a co-chair would prefer to do this then please let me
know.
Steve
Paul,
Concerning
> http://www.few.vu.nl/~pzn400/apidoc/
How does this relate to the python bindings implicitly defined by the
C++ Python/Boost work at
https://svn.cct.lsu.edu/repos/saga/trunk/bindings/saga/python/
Do you plan a definitive Python SAGA API binding in addition to the
Java and C++? Is this idea accepted?
I ask because we are doing the service discovery package. We plan to
provide C++, Java and Python implementations. Most of the work is in
the adapters which we don't want to have to translate. My current
preference is to make any inter-language calls at the adapter level
rather than at the top level as this seems to be the only way to build
a natural looking API. Are you doing Python adapters as well?
Is their any consensus which way to go?
Steve
