Requirements spreadsheet and comment period
Hi Morris, Johannes, all, I cross-checked the PGI mailing list archive, and couldn't find an e-mail containing the call for comments on the requirements spreadsheet prepared in Brussels. The only indication can be found in the 3rd set of OGF session notes, which are very difficult, if at all possible, to interpret for a person who was not present at the meeting. Specifically, Steven suggested to post the "spreadsheet with color code to list" and allow "7 days for objections to the list". This should be a "priority activity of working group" (all quotes are from minutes as is, only verbs are added). Admittedly, it is difficult to understand from the notes whether it was a decision or just a proposal, but my recollection is that everybody agreed to follow this - at least nobody in the room objected. I would thus kindly ask the group chair(s) to actually post the "spreadsheet with color code" to the list and thus launch the 7-days "objections" period, making this a "priority activity". I hope everybody agrees that minutes with non-explicit links and ambiguous wording do not amount for a proper call for comments on a specific document. Those of us who were in Brussels can decode it (like Etienne did), but those who weren't can not. Many thanks, Oxana
Oxana, my only comment to this is : please be realistic. I hear out of this that you volunteer for the long vacant PGI secretary position to make it better in terms of minutes, right? Thanks for your support. Take care, Morris
-- -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- -- Von: pgi-wg-bounces@ogf.org [mailto:pgi-wg-bounces@ogf.org] Im Auftrag von Oxana Smirnova -- Gesendet: Freitag, 12. November 2010 01:25 -- An: pgi-wg@ogf.org -- Betreff: [Pgi-wg] Requirements spreadsheet and comment period -- -- Hi Morris, Johannes, all, -- -- I cross-checked the PGI mailing list archive, and couldn't find an e-mail containing the call for comments on -- the requirements spreadsheet prepared in Brussels. The only indication can be found in the 3rd set of OGF -- session notes, which are very difficult, if at all possible, to interpret for a person who was not present at -- the meeting. -- -- Specifically, Steven suggested to post the "spreadsheet with color code to list" and allow "7 days for -- objections to the list". This should be a "priority activity of working group" (all quotes are from minutes as -- is, only verbs are added). -- -- Admittedly, it is difficult to understand from the notes whether it was a decision or just a proposal, but my -- recollection is that everybody agreed to follow this - at least nobody in the room objected. -- -- I would thus kindly ask the group chair(s) to actually post the "spreadsheet with color code" to the list and -- thus launch the 7-days "objections" period, making this a "priority activity". -- -- I hope everybody agrees that minutes with non-explicit links and ambiguous wording do not amount for a proper -- call for comments on a specific document. Those of us who were in Brussels can decode it (like Etienne did), but -- those who weren't can not. -- -- Many thanks, -- Oxana
Hi Oxana, I have sent out the call for comments after our sessions in Brussels. I will resend it in a minute. Best, Johannes Am 12.11.2010 01:25, schrieb Oxana Smirnova:
Hi Morris, Johannes, all,
I cross-checked the PGI mailing list archive, and couldn't find an e-mail containing the call for comments on the requirements spreadsheet prepared in Brussels. The only indication can be found in the 3rd set of OGF session notes, which are very difficult, if at all possible, to interpret for a person who was not present at the meeting.
Specifically, Steven suggested to post the "spreadsheet with color code to list" and allow "7 days for objections to the list". This should be a "priority activity of working group" (all quotes are from minutes as is, only verbs are added).
Admittedly, it is difficult to understand from the notes whether it was a decision or just a proposal, but my recollection is that everybody agreed to follow this - at least nobody in the room objected.
I would thus kindly ask the group chair(s) to actually post the "spreadsheet with color code" to the list and thus launch the 7-days "objections" period, making this a "priority activity".
I hope everybody agrees that minutes with non-explicit links and ambiguous wording do not amount for a proper call for comments on a specific document. Those of us who were in Brussels can decode it (like Etienne did), but those who weren't can not.
Many thanks, Oxana
_______________________________________________ Pgi-wg mailing list Pgi-wg@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/pgi-wg
-- _ _ _ _ _ _ Johannes Watzl |\/| |\ | |\/| Institut für Informatik / Dept. of CS | | | \| | | Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München ======= TEAM ======= Oettingenstr. 67, 80538 Munich, Germany Room E 005, Phone +49-89-2180-9162 Munich Network Management Team Email: watzl@nm.ifi.lmu.de Münchner Netz-Management Team http://www.nm.ifi.lmu.de/~watzl
Thanks a lot, Johannes! Sorry for the noise - I missed this message somehow :-( Cheers, Oxana On 12.11.2010 10:42, Johannes Watzl wrote:
Hi Oxana,
I have sent out the call for comments after our sessions in Brussels. I will resend it in a minute.
Best, Johannes
Am 12.11.2010 01:25, schrieb Oxana Smirnova:
Hi Morris, Johannes, all,
I cross-checked the PGI mailing list archive, and couldn't find an e-mail containing the call for comments on the requirements spreadsheet prepared in Brussels. The only indication can be found in the 3rd set of OGF session notes, which are very difficult, if at all possible, to interpret for a person who was not present at the meeting.
Specifically, Steven suggested to post the "spreadsheet with color code to list" and allow "7 days for objections to the list". This should be a "priority activity of working group" (all quotes are from minutes as is, only verbs are added).
Admittedly, it is difficult to understand from the notes whether it was a decision or just a proposal, but my recollection is that everybody agreed to follow this - at least nobody in the room objected.
I would thus kindly ask the group chair(s) to actually post the "spreadsheet with color code" to the list and thus launch the 7-days "objections" period, making this a "priority activity".
I hope everybody agrees that minutes with non-explicit links and ambiguous wording do not amount for a proper call for comments on a specific document. Those of us who were in Brussels can decode it (like Etienne did), but those who weren't can not.
Many thanks, Oxana
_______________________________________________ Pgi-wg mailing list Pgi-wg@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/pgi-wg
On 12.11.2010 11:31, Oxana Smirnova wrote:
Thanks a lot, Johannes! Sorry for the noise - I missed this message somehow :-(
Uhh, I didn't miss it - I even answered... But looks as if some others missed it... Cheers, Oxana
participants (3)
-
Johannes Watzl -
Morris Riedel -
Oxana Smirnova