Re: [Pgi-wg] Promised document

still can get consensus that makes sense and not drift off like in an IDL-like thinking where solutions come up that are not interoperable at all...
The 'IDL' approach has been found to be very useful to agree on the data structures in & out and the semantics of an operation without getting bogged down in rendering discussions. Rendering this agreed interface is then found to be very simple. This is exactly the process that has been used in doing the GLUE specification... and that drifting off activity seemed to work out OK! Steven

Wow, and so we have the perfect base (IDL) for two non-interoperable solutions/renderings of it (front 1) and (front 2)! And I remember this from somewhere in the past... Can we go back to UNICORE UPL and gLite JDL then... only defining data-structures doesn't help on the real wire and thus does not really enable interoperability. We failed in OGSA-RUS in this approach and my experience in using different DRMAA implementations together wasn't that much better (only slightly because of language-based renderings...) Take care, Morris ------------------------------------------------------------ Morris Riedel SW - Engineer Distributed Systems and Grid Computing Division Jülich Supercomputing Centre (JSC) Forschungszentrum Juelich Wilhelm-Johnen-Str. 1 D - 52425 Juelich Germany Email: m.riedel@fz-juelich.de Info: http://www.fz-juelich.de/jsc/JSCPeople/riedel Phone: +49 2461 61 - 3651 Fax: +49 2461 61 - 6656 Skype: MorrisRiedel "We work to better ourselves, and the rest of humanity" Sitz der Gesellschaft: Jülich Eingetragen im Handelsregister des Amtsgerichts Düren Nr. HR B 3498 Vorsitzende des Aufsichtsrats: MinDirig'in Bärbel Brumme-Bothe Vorstand: Prof. Dr. Achim Bachem (Vorsitzender), Dr. Ulrich Krafft (stellv. Vorsitzender)
------Original Message----- -From: Steven Newhouse [mailto:Steven.Newhouse@cern.ch] -Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2009 3:12 PM -To: Morris Riedel; Moreno Marzolla -Cc: balazs.konya@hep.lu.se; pgi-wg@ogf.org -Subject: RE: [Pgi-wg] Promised document - -> still can get consensus that makes sense and not drift off like in an -> IDL-like thinking where solutions come up that are not interoperable -at -> all... - -The 'IDL' approach has been found to be very useful to agree on the data -structures in & out and the semantics of an operation without getting -bogged down in rendering discussions. - -Rendering this agreed interface is then found to be very simple. This is -exactly the process that has been used in doing the GLUE -specification... and that drifting off activity seemed to work out OK! - -Steven
participants (2)
-
Morris Riedel
-
Steven Newhouse