Dear all, please see below the notes of today's call. Best, Johannes Participants: Etienne, Morris, Johannes, Emannouil, Balazs, Oxana, Jules, Luigi Agenda: a)

-Debrief minutes of last PGI TelCon - -(b) -Debrief PGI actions - -(c) -Very short: continue discussion animation ppt of PGI operation & state model -Re: Developer experience says MUST might be tough - -(d) -Debrief Steven Newhouse comments on the list - -(e) -Debrief Bernd Schuller comments on the list - -(f) -Debrief Etienne Comments on the list - -(g) -Next meeting - -(h) -AOB

Balazs: two more points for discussion shift meeting half an hour earlier agreed to shift the meeing on Thursday 15:30 (CET) how to edit the document make the document more readable notes in ppt - reference in document to ppt Balazs will be editor of the document remark changes Morris will keep track of ppt working slides identify tasks which should be done by certain people ad a) add action: nail down ppt lot of comments ad b) updated version of action will be sent out after the meeting ad c) going through the slides, editing the slides outcome of last weeks discussion: approach A will be chosen short overview of the "dropped" approaches Morris: questions: what do ARC people think about? Balazs: two operations mandatory? Morris: discuss now Balazs: requirement part in createActivity operation you should put a limit in your server for vector operations sees no problem Morris: one step approach here you get everything back maybe broken job ids or job ids point to broken jobs, killed jobs etc... Balazs: will fail because not validated both are vector operations spec requires validation Morris: only steps 1,2,3 are mandatory Balazs: what is the initial stat the job gets to Etienne: createActivity -> validated substate before createActivity previous substate has to be created submitted validating submitted validated Morris: state model with different starting points? Etienne: initial state without name inside the submitted state action for Balazs: integrate discussed points in document before next meeting Etienne: notification can be only used if supported by SOAP Morris: keep this first out of PGI space Balazs: how can session directory be handled? Morris: back to the client we have two options A use of GLUE elements in ResourceInfo portType B query job properties in the Execution portType Balazs: and we have 0 SOAP Response contains it next meeting: discuss comments by S. Newhouse and B. Schuller these comments are integrated int he ppt Morris: very good conclusions Balazs will check this with spec before next meeting - highlight points to be discussed Etienne: title of document change? Balazs: Etienne will edit document with track changes on Etienne: move chapter 5 before chapter 2 Balazs: will be done -- _ _ _ _ _ _ Johannes Watzl |\/| |\ | |\/| Institut für Informatik / Dept. of CS | | | \| | | Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München ======= TEAM ======= Oettingenstr. 67, 80538 Munich, Germany Room E 005, Phone +49-89-2180-9162 Munich Network Management Team Email: watzl@nm.ifi.lmu.de Münchner Netz-Management Team http://www.nm.ifi.lmu.de/~watzl