Johannes and Michaela, GoToMeeting voice sharing had bad quality, and User interface is poor. I fully agree with Michaela : DFN has acceptable sound quality and good user interface. Therefore, I propose to revert to DFN. Best regards. ----------------------------------------------------- Etienne URBAH LAL, Univ Paris-Sud, IN2P3/CNRS Bat 200 91898 ORSAY France Tel: +33 1 64 46 84 87 Skype: etienne.urbah Mob: +33 6 22 30 53 27 mailto:urbah@lal.in2p3.fr ----------------------------------------------------- On Thu, 15/07/2010 17:32, Johannes Watzl wrote:
Hi Michaela,
for me the DFN system was also working without problems in different operating systems. For me DFN would be fine.
Best, Johannes
Am 15.07.2010 17:17, schrieb Michaela Lechner:
Just an add-on to the last point by Etienne: So far I was most satisfied with DFN: I experienced good soundquality without any noticeable breaks, I could read the chat and watch the screenshare all at the same time without having to install anything, it is OS independent. The list of all users seemed complete. Now I even bought an office microphone...
I don't quite understand why it was classified as moderate by Morris. To me at least it looked like a rather good solution. I'll be on vacation next week so I unfortunately won't be able to join the next meeting to test another fancy telco system. ;-)
Cheers, Michaela