HI Moreno, Could we then have effort from Balazs, Morris or yourself to remove the "This needs text", "Further info needed" sections etc. Personally I prefer the extremely concise list within Andrews document. If we don't like that can we strip the Strawman (which it is not a requirements document) of extraneous text and get back to an explicit list of the requirements for specific components. David On 15/05/2009 11:20, "Moreno Marzolla" <moreno.marzolla@pd.infn.it> wrote:
David Wallom wrote:
Hi All,
Can we first agree (on the list, possibly with a doodle vote) that the requirements described in Andrews document were accurate. At this first stage please ignore the implementation, just are the requirements correct and if not what changes are required.
The requirements document is this one:
http://forge.ogf.org/sf/go/doc15590?nav=1
(possibly with a better name). I suggest that any modification and improvement of the requirements should be done there.
Moreno.