All,

I’ve just had the chance to catch up with my email and had not seen any comment to Andrew’s document? Was this discussed on the call this week? What was the result...

The distillation of the GES requirements document into a number of succinct points was very coherent! Is this list something that we can all agree on? What is missing if anything?

If we all agree on these focused requirements we can then drill down into seeing how each individual component can be met from current specifications. If not then we have defined a clear case to profile or write additional specifications to fill these gaps.

And we will have made some concrete progress towards our goal!

Steven

Dr Steven Newhouse

EGEE Technical Director

Contact Details: http://cern.ch/Steven.Newhouse

EGEE09 Conference 21-25 September, Barcelona - http://egee09.eu-egee.org/ 

Call for Sessions - http://indico.cern.ch/conferenceDisplay.py?confId=55893

From: pgi-wg-bounces@ogf.org [mailto:pgi-wg-bounces@ogf.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Grimshaw
Sent: 12 May 2009 16:06
To: pgi-wg@ogf.org
Subject: [Pgi-wg] Promised document

Colleagues,

Last week I promised to deliver a document for discussion tomorrow on how to use existing specification (and profiles on those specifications) to realize the requirements in the April 29 draft GES info document. Attached is a word file that sketches out the solution. The document is not intended to be published – it is to organize a discussion and give you insight into my proposed solution to the requirements.

I have also carefully read the GES document and have a number of comments on that as well. I will be sending it later today or tomorrow. My comments on the GES are not necessary to understand the “realization” document. I also encourage you to read the ISV primer.

Andrew