I have uploaded the "Mid-range Computing" usecase document with revisions to address comments. Summarized as follows: * Comments from Morris Riedel - Comments embedded in the original -- I tried to address these as they popped up in the document - PGI section could be filled in with more detailed "requirements" that are not covered by BES, JSDL, etc. -- I'm not really sure what you mean here. That section says that those specs cover what PGI needs, so there are no additional requirements not covered by them. I can't really list requirements not covered by BES and JSDL without knowing details of PGI that I don't have * Comments from Etienne - The template is BAD -- The template is the exact one that we as a group decided on (more than once) to adopt. Comment is therefor irrelevant and unhelpful. * Oxana - Does not address necessity of common interfaces and standards -- No part of the use case requires those things, why should the use case have them? - Too generic -- Possibly, however, changing it to be less generic would significantly change the use case itself making it a new use case and so I left it as it is. if it is unacceptable in its current state, then that is OK, but otherwise it is what it is.