Oxana, my only comment to this is : please be realistic. I hear out of this that you volunteer for the long vacant PGI secretary position to make it better in terms of minutes, right? Thanks for your support. Take care, Morris
-- -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- -- Von: pgi-wg-bounces@ogf.org [mailto:pgi-wg-bounces@ogf.org] Im Auftrag von Oxana Smirnova -- Gesendet: Freitag, 12. November 2010 01:25 -- An: pgi-wg@ogf.org -- Betreff: [Pgi-wg] Requirements spreadsheet and comment period -- -- Hi Morris, Johannes, all, -- -- I cross-checked the PGI mailing list archive, and couldn't find an e-mail containing the call for comments on -- the requirements spreadsheet prepared in Brussels. The only indication can be found in the 3rd set of OGF -- session notes, which are very difficult, if at all possible, to interpret for a person who was not present at -- the meeting. -- -- Specifically, Steven suggested to post the "spreadsheet with color code to list" and allow "7 days for -- objections to the list". This should be a "priority activity of working group" (all quotes are from minutes as -- is, only verbs are added). -- -- Admittedly, it is difficult to understand from the notes whether it was a decision or just a proposal, but my -- recollection is that everybody agreed to follow this - at least nobody in the room objected. -- -- I would thus kindly ask the group chair(s) to actually post the "spreadsheet with color code" to the list and -- thus launch the 7-days "objections" period, making this a "priority activity". -- -- I hope everybody agrees that minutes with non-explicit links and ambiguous wording do not amount for a proper -- call for comments on a specific document. Those of us who were in Brussels can decode it (like Etienne did), but -- those who weren't can not. -- -- Many thanks, -- Oxana