Hi,
-- I don't quite understand why it was classified as moderate by Morris.
In fact some members stated in the past that they have 'moderate' problems with it, but reading the e-mail thread it seems like DFN is better than I stated. I see no problem then in continuing with the DFN system. Thanks for the feedback! Take care, Morris
-- -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- -- Von: pgi-wg-bounces@ogf.org [mailto:pgi-wg-bounces@ogf.org] Im Auftrag von -- Michaela Lechner -- Gesendet: Donnerstag, 15. Juli 2010 17:17 -- Cc: pgi-wg@ogf.org -- Betreff: Re: [Pgi-wg] PGI call 2010-07-15 notes -- -- Just an add-on to the last point by Etienne: -- So far I was most satisfied with DFN: I experienced good soundquality -- without any noticeable breaks, I could read the chat and watch the -- screenshare all at the same time without having to install anything, it -- is OS independent. The list of all users seemed complete. Now I even -- bought an office microphone... -- -- I don't quite understand why it was classified as moderate by Morris. To -- me at least it looked like a rather good solution. -- I'll be on vacation next week so I unfortunately won't be able to join -- the next meeting to test another fancy telco system. ;-) -- -- Cheers, -- Michaela -- -- Johannes Watzl skrev: -- > Dear all, -- > -- > please see below the notes from today's call. -- > -- > Best, -- > Johannes -- > -- > -- > participants: -- > Etienne, Johannes, Stephen Crouch, Luigi, Mark, Oxana, Michael Saravo, -- > Michaela, Emmanouil -- > -- > Agenda: -- > -- > (a) Discuss Use Cases and Use Case Template -- > -- > Luigi: uploaded the use case right now -- > -- > agreed to extend the deadlines by one week for -- > -- > collecting the comments on use cases: 22 July 2010 -- > integrating the comments into the document: 29 July 2010 -- > -- > Use case template -- > Johannes: -- > proposition from Etienne to use another template -- > Etienne: -- > OGSA template is not good -- > want to see the different roles in the use case template -- > -- > Mark: -- > should go with the template we have agreed on -- > -- > Steve: -- > Question to Mark: is it adequate? -- > -- > Mark: -- > yes, have already used it for previous use cases -- > -- > Oxana: -- > not too comfortable with the template -- > also wants to see different actors -- > -- > -- > agreement: -- > go with the old template, collect comments for the use cases and -- > integrate the comments -- > -- > -- > (b) Discussion of the whole document process : Which documents should -- > OGF PGI produce, in which order, in which time frame, ... -- > -- > Mark: -- > Proposition -- > start with three documents: -- > 1) Glossary -- > 2) Use cases -- > 3) Requirements -- > -- > should act as a basis for other documents -- > upcoming documents will be discussed later -- > -- > agreement on this process -- > -- > (c) Co-chair, Secretary positions -- > Mark: no decision yet -- > secretary position still open - no volunteers now - shift to offline -- > discussion -- > -- > (d) AOB -- > Etienne: -- > we should try to find another telco system -- > -- > -- > -- > -- > -- > -- > -- -- -- -- -- Michaela Lechner -- EGI.eu Coordination of Interoperations between NGIs and with other Grids -- PDC Center for High Performance Computing -- CSC School of Computer Science and Communication -- KTH Royal Institute of Technology -- SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden -- -- Tel: +468-790 7891 -- SIP: caela@kth.se -- XMPP: caela@kth.se -- -- _______________________________________________ -- Pgi-wg mailing list -- Pgi-wg@ogf.org -- http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/pgi-wg