
Hi, as you saw in Andreas's minutes, we reviewed a few more terms on Monday's call, in the continuing convergence of the EGA and OGSA glossaries. We decided not to include DMTF, and we reviewed "utility computing," but decided not to include it for the time being - we'll revisit that decision later. We reviewed SLA and SLO. For SLA, I've converged the two definitions by reducing the wordiness of the OGSA definition and adding the concept of payment, which was in the EGA definition. The definition of SLO is unchanged from the OGSA version, because the definitions were consistent Service-level agreement: A contract between a provider and a user that specifies the level of service that is expected during the term of the contract. SLAs are used by vendors and customers, as well as internally by IT shops and their end users. They might specify availability requirements and response times for normal operations and for problem resolution (network down, machine failure, etc.), and they might stipulate the payment and/or penalties associated with meeting or failing to meet the agreed criteria. See also: Service-level objective Service-level objective: A target level of service for a resource or a set of resources. An SLO might be expressed in units such as average response time for a representative set of transaction types, or in terms of the monthly availability of a given service. See also: Service-level agreement If you have comments please let me know; otherwise I'll move these terms into the draft document. - Jem ________________________________ Jem Treadwell Hewlett-Packard Company 6000 Irwin Road Mount Laurel, NJ 08054 Phone: 856-638-6021 Fax: 856-638-6190 E-mail: Jem.Treadwell@hp.com <mailto:Jem.Treadwell@hp.com>

Treadwell, Jem wrote:
If you have comments please let me know; otherwise I'll move these terms into the draft document.
Maybe you should say that a SLA may include a number of SLOs. But otherwise they look pretty good. (Also: can a SLO refer to an ordinary general service, or does it need to refer to a resource?) Donal.

I concur with Donal's points. I think that it's very important that we explicitly make the linkage between SLOs and SLAs. SLAs are comprised of SLOs. Provider/Consumer SLA = SLOs + Penalty/Reward SLOs are also associated with services in the broader sense and this should be reflected in the definition. eBay's search service definitely has SLOs. And I don't think one could easily argue that it is a resource in the OGSA sense :o) Regards Paul -----Original Message----- From: ogsa-wg-bounces@ogf.org [mailto:ogsa-wg-bounces@ogf.org] On Behalf Of Donal K. Fellows Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 3:18 AM To: Treadwell, Jem Cc: ogsa-wg WG Subject: Re: [ogsa-wg] Glossary defs: SLA/SLO Treadwell, Jem wrote:
If you have comments please let me know; otherwise I'll move these terms into the draft document.
Maybe you should say that a SLA may include a number of SLOs. But otherwise they look pretty good. (Also: can a SLO refer to an ordinary general service, or does it need to refer to a resource?) Donal. -- ogsa-wg mailing list ogsa-wg@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogsa-wg
participants (3)
-
Donal K. Fellows
-
Strong, Paul
-
Treadwell, Jem