Thanks Steven, My comments inline <HK>. ---- Hiro Kishimoto Steven Newhouse wrote:

OGSA WSRF Basic Profile 1.0 (v018 June 13th 2005)

Page 1: Status of this memo Is there not a WSRF missing from this opening line? e.g. '... write normative OGSA services based around the WSRF set of specifications.'

<HK> Good catch! Your text works for me. </HK>

OGSA Roadmap (v010 June 6th 2005)

Section 2, Point 1, Bullet 3: Should these service description documents not be 'owned' by the working group developing the service? The text implies to me that the OGSA-WG writes them... which I don't think is the case.

<HK> Good point. Let's add something like "domain-expert WG writes this service description (scenario document) if appropriate." </HK>

Section 2.2: Should there not be some statement that OGSA profiles should be developed/revised outside the OGSA-WG in theor own WG?

<HK> I think they can if their Profile abide by OGSA branding guideline. </HK>

Cheers,

Steven