Hi Tom and Dave, Following is a list of open issues on OGSA WSRF BP 1.0 v020. It includes existing comments in the document but does not cover security section (section 8) or appendix E, which Frank is now working on. Page and line number is based on v020. (a1) page 5 line 200 E0302 claims extensibility elements for wsa:Metadata? Is extensibility for wsa:ReferenceParameters necessary? (a2) page 5 line 211 Since there is no amendment in the Profile, should we delete this line? (a3) page 8 line 339 (Latha's comment) We probably want to say something here about throwing the same faults that GetMultipleResourceProperties message does. Same comment for all other messages such as Destroy, Subscribe etc. Perhaps we can address this in the next rev. after GGF14. (a4) page 9 line 363 (Tom's comment) There are 2 specs need to chose which is appropriate. Still needs work. (a5) page 9 line 384 5.2 Scheduled Destruction should be added. (a6) page 9 line 394 (Jem and Latha's comment) Tom, we need to clarify this a bit. The comma I removed created some ambiguity, but we’re (Latha and I) are not sure exactly what the intent of this is. (a7) page 10 line 412 (Tom's comment) Add MESSAGE reqt. (a8) page 10 line 440 Don't we need extensibility points for Base Faults? I think we need to carry detailed fault information. (a9) page 11 line 450 Since there is no amendment in the Profile, should we delete this line? (a10) page 13 Contributers and acknowledgment sections. (a11) page 24 WS-BN should be evolving before final submission. Thanks, -- Hiro Kishimoto