Mark's email bounced. ---- Hiro Kishimoto From: "Mark Morgan" <mmm2a@cs.virginia.edu> To: "'Hiro Kishimoto'" <hiro.kishimoto@jp.fujitsu.com>, "'ogsa-wg'" <ogsa-wg@gridforum.org> Subject: RE: [ogsa-wg] OGSA ByteIO WG charter Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 11:49:25 -0500 Just to let everyone know, the ByteIO group plans on having it's first telecon next Tuesday at 11AM Easter (8AM Pacific, and I "think" 4PM UK). Our agenda for that telecon includes the groups first discussion of the charter. More details to follow. -Mark

-----Original Message----- From: owner-ogsa-wg@ggf.org [mailto:owner-ogsa-wg@ggf.org] On Behalf Of Hiro Kishimoto Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 5:59 AM To: 'ogsa-wg' Subject: [ogsa-wg] OGSA ByteIO WG charter

Hi all,

GFSG asks me to send out revised OGSA-ByteIO WG charter draft to OGSA-WG mailing list for your review. Two WGs should be consistent and WG charter is binding document to materialize it.

Please read them carefully and let me know if you have any comments. Since GFSG will approve this WG on next Tuesday at earliest, yours comment should be made by next Monday. If necessary, we can discuss this topic at Monday call.

The following is my comments.

(1) Acronym, email address, web page should be the same, e.g.; Acronym: OGSA-BIO email list: ogsa-bio-wg@ggf.org web page: https://forge.gridforum.org/projects/ogsa-bio-wg

(2) OGSA infrastructure (first paragraph of scope section) It should be based on "OGSA basic profile v1.0" instead of "WSRF."

(3) Any other relevant information This section should be described more specific in order to make WG's documents will be consistent with OGSA-WG. I prefer the following;

As the ByteIO interface is intended to be part of OGSA, the WG should have joint review discussion with OGSA-WG and OGSA-D-WG before EVERY milestones, e.g. first draft recommendation document review before GGF14.

Thanks, ---- Hiro Kishimoto