Hiro, I can't make Wed's ogsa-wg call, but my choice would be option 2 - the 90 min sessions with a 8am start time. Ellen Hiro Kishimoto <hiro.kishimoto@jp.fujitsu.com> Sent by: owner-ogsa-wg@ggf.org 09/20/2005 09:02 PM To Manuel Pereira <mpereira@almaden.ibm.com>, Andrew Grimshaw <grimshaw@cs.virginia.edu>, Marvin Theimer <theimer@microsoft.com> cc ogsa-wg@ggf.org Subject Re: [ogsa-wg] OGSA-WG F2F draft schedule in Boston (Oct. 6&7) Hi Manuel, If Thursday morning works for Andrew and Marvin, I am happy to move it there. If so, I see two options; (1) 60 minutes session packed like sardines 9-10am naming 10-11:30am EMS (1) WS-agreement 11:30am-12:30pm EMS (2) CDDLM/ACS <lunch> 1:30-3:30pm EMS (3) CDDLM/ACS 3:30-5pm info/data model 5-6pm re-charter (2) 90 minutes session with earlier start 8-9:30am naming 9:30-11am EMS (1) WS-agreement 11am-12:30pm EMS (2) CDDLM/ACS <lunch> 1:30-3pm EMS (3) CDDLM/ACS 3:30-5pm info/data model 5-6pm re-charter Let's talk on Wednesday, thanks, ---- Hiro Kishimoto Manuel Pereira wrote:

Hello all,

Would it be possible to discuss OGSA-naming early Thursday?

Thank you for considering.

Manuel Pereira IBM Almaden Research Center 1-408-927-1935 [T/L 457] mpereira@us.ibm.com

Monday, September 19, 2005 4:56 AM To: ogsa-wg@ggf.org cc: From: Hiro Kishimoto <hiro.kishimoto@jp.fujitsu.com> Subject: [ogsa-wg] OGSA-WG F2F draft schedule in Boston (Oct. 6&7)

Hi all,

Based on the all feedbacks on OGSA-WG F2F meeting which is back-to-back with GGF15, the following is the first-cut draft schedule.

Let's discuss at upcoming Monday call.

Oct.6 (Thursday) 1. 9-10:30 am: EMS (1) WS-Agreement discussion (GRAAP-WG) 2. 11am-12:30pm: EMS (2) CDDLM & ACS discussion (I)

3. 1:30-3pm: EMS (3) CDDLM & ACS discussion (II) 4. 3:30-5pm: Resource Management, info/data model discussion (Fred & Ellen) 5. 5-6pm: OGSA re-charter draft review

Oct. 7 (Friday) 1. 8-9:30am: OGSA-BES session (Andrew) 2. 10-11:30am: OGSA-naming session (Andrew)

3. 12:30-2pm: OGSA-data session (DaveB and Allen) 4. 2-3pm: Wrap-up and next step

Thanks, -- Hiro Kishimoto