Jem, I added all of your nits. I reread Appendix E. You are correct that it should be MUST NOT not MAY NOT. Good catch. Tom "Treadwell, Jem" <jem.treadwell@hp.com> wrote on 07/29/2005 04:46:06 PM:
Tom, my annotated review attached. I gather that you've already incorporated comments from others, so this is based on a clean copy of v36. Most of these are, of course, minor nits, and some are just periods or colons added. However, there are a couple that are quite significant, most notably the use of MAY NOT in Appendix E.
Your discretion on which of these you incorporate, and I vote YES to go to the editor. Great job by you and the whole team!
- Jem
-----Original Message----- From: owner-ogsa-wg@ggf.org [mailto:owner-ogsa-wg@ggf.org] On Behalf Of Tom Maguire Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 11:48 PM To: ogsa-wg@ggf.org Subject: [ogsa-wg] FINAL CALL Document OGSA WSRF BP 1.0 v036
https://forge.gridforum.org/projects/ogsa-wg/document/draft-gg f-ogsa-wsrf-basic-profile/en/31
The final call document for the OGSA WSRF Basic Profile 1.0 is available for download at the above link. Please review and positive acknowledge with an email to the mailing list with your vote (yea or nay) for submission from the workgroup to the GGF Editor. Please vote (email) by Friday, July 29th COB (EDT).
If your vote is 'nay' please include precise comments so that we may address any substantive issues you may have prior to submission.
Thanks, Tom
Frey's Law: "Every 5 years the number of architecture components double and the ability to comprehend them halves"
Perfection is achieved, not when there is nothing more to add, but when there is nothing left to take away. - Antoine de Saint-Exupery
T o m M a g u i r e
STSM, On Demand Architecture
Poughkeepsie, NY 12601
[attachment "draft-ggf-ogsa-wsrf-basic-profile_v36_jem.doc" deleted by Tom Maguire/Hawthorne/IBM]