Hi, A couple of questions: o Would be good to clarify whether profiles only clarify existing standards or wtherer they can change them? I would hope only clarify or restrict but do not change. Should this be stated explicitly? o I worry about the statement that profiles need not be consistent with other profiles. This then puts in a requirement for meta profiles to clarify interoperability issues between profiles and you get into an endless loop. Surely once a profile is accepted by the GGF process other profiles should be consistent with their predecessors *unless* they have good reason not to do so. People need to talk to each other to make sure profiles interoperate at some level. Also, one typo on page 2 end of first paragraph "later"->"latter", Mario On Tue, 12 Apr 2005, David Snelling wrote:
Folks,
Following a weeks time for comments, I have received very little but valuable feedback. I have clarified the definition of the Infrastructure Level, which several people noted was not as clear as it could be.
Further comments welcome. It is not yet frozen.
--
Take care:
Dr. David Snelling < David . Snelling . UK . Fujitsu . com > Fujitsu Laboratories of Europe Hayes Park Central Hayes End Road Hayes, Middlesex UB4 8FE
+44-208-606-4649 (Office) +44-208-606-4539 (Fax) +44-7768-807526 (Mobile)
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+ |Mario Antonioletti:EPCC,JCMB,The King's Buildings,Edinburgh EH9 3JZ. | |Tel:0131 650 5141|mario@epcc.ed.ac.uk|http://www.epcc.ed.ac.uk/~mario/ | +-----------------------------------------------------------------------+