All,

Recall that back at the January face-to-face Frank and Dave took an action to write up their take on the requirements for (low-level) naming. Attached is their draft.

 

A few comments of mine based on my read and discussions of the document with Dave.

 

1)    This is not intended as a replacement for the existing work.

2)    It is requirements – not specifications. Rather, it is a call for specifications that address the requirements.

3)    Several of the requirements are met by the existing WS-Naming draft specification, though some are not.

4)    Two of the proposed “specifications”, 5.2 and 5.4 are covered by the existing WS-Name specification. A variant of 5.3 is covered in the WS-Name spec. The variant specified a technique that could be used to ensure that identifying information would be sent with the headers  - specifically embed names in the reference parameters. Personally I fell that 5.3 is a fine replacement for that if desired. 5.1 is not covered at all, and I must confess that it seems so obvious that I had implicitly assumed it true. Dave says it is not – so having a spec that says it must be true seems ok to me.

5)    I think that with a small amount of work on this document and the WS-Name spec we can make them dovetail quite nicely.

 

 

GGF is a scant two weeks away. I’d like to schedule a teleconference with the following agenda on Friday April 28th, at 10 AM eastern.  (Dial in information as soon as I find a dial in number we can use.)  If you plan on attending, PLEASE read both the existing draft WS-Name spec and this document before the call.

 

Proposed Agenda:

Max time             Subject

5 minutes            Agenda bashing

30 minutes          Discuss draft requirements document including vis a vis existing draft WS-Name document

30 minutes          Discuss approval of DRAFT WS-Names document to send to GFSG for GFSG approval. Note                                  we will prepare a version that does not include the language that overlaps 5.3.

25 minutes          Attempt to come to closure on working group consensus regarding WS-Directory, RNS, or

                             failing that, at least what the issues are.

         

 

Andrew Grimshaw

Professor of Computer Science

University of Virginia

434-982-2204

grimshaw@cs.virginia.edu