
Hi Steven and Michel,
This would be a useful reference for many groups and help to show how the work going on in individual WGs fits together.
I agree to that. It would also actually help keeping scope creep out of the involved Working Groups.
Sound great. Could we have some time to discuss this topic at the F2F? Does Tuesday evening (e.g. 5:30-6pm) work for you guys? Thanks, ---- Hiro Kishimoto -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re:[ogsa-wg] EMS Architecture Scenarios v1.0+ From: Michel Drescher <Michel.Drescher@uk.fujitsu.com> To: Steven Newhouse <Steven.Newhouse@microsoft.com> Cc: "ogsa-wg@ogf.org" <ogsa-wg@ogf.org> Date: 2007/08/09 18:53
Hi Steve,
Steven Newhouse wrote:
[...] Generally, having scenarios in the current version of the document using specs that are not developing and/or not going to be adopted is a concern to me. There is IMHO a clear benefit in having these sequence diagrams to inform other groups & incorporate their thinking into a single cohesive document. This should be one of our principals for future versions – not to expand into a massive sequence diagram repository but to keep a narrow focus on incremental scenarios in the EMS space. This would be a useful reference for many groups and help to show how the work going on in individual WGs fits together.
I agree to that. It would also actually help keeping scope creep out of the involved Working Groups.
I am not a UML guy, but I was wondering whether it is possible to draw/incorporate some sort of interface boundary between the "umbrella" EPS sequence diagrams, and the sequence diagrams that clearly belong to the WGs that solve a specific problem, i.e. OGSA-DMI, OGSA-BES, OGSA-RSS (which actually covers two topics w/ interfaces - CSG and EPS). This would vice versa keep the scope of EMS to some sort of "glue" sticking all the individual parts together.
Regarding your initial list of 4 topics, I would consider #2, #3 and #4 prime topics of EMS 1.0+, and #1 more of an issue for the OGSA-RSS group, which needs some man power here I guess.
Cheers, Michel
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- ogsa-wg mailing list ogsa-wg@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogsa-wg