I disagree. There are no firm decisions or plans so 'may' is more appropriate at the moment. Andreas Djaoui, A (Abdeslem) wrote:
Hi
Following from previous email... I see I am too late and a decision has already been made. So I suggest modifying the sentence "There may be additional profiles in the future that will include discovery functions"
to:
"Discovery will be covered by future specifications and profiles."
Abdeslem //////////////
-----Original Message----- From: owner-ogsa-wg@ggf.org [mailto:owner-ogsa-wg@ggf.org] On Behalf Of Hiro Kishimoto Sent: 22 September 2005 09:26 To: ogsa-wg@ggf.org Subject: [ogsa-wg] OGSA WSRF BP 1.0 Editor submission final call
Hi all,
At the today's OGSA-WG call, we discussed BP 1.0 once more and agreed the following two;
(1) Exclude UDDI section of WS-I BP 1.1 from OGSA WSRF BP Now, section 1.2 (page 4 line 114-116) says;
This Profile extends the WS-I Basic Profile 1.1 [WS-I BP 1.1]. All requirements except for section 5 "Service Publication and Discovery" specified in WS-I BP 1.1 pertain to this Profile. There may be additional profiles in the future that will include discovery functions.
Revised really final draft (v043) is on the GridForge. https://forge.gridforum.org/projects/ogsa-wg/document/draft-ggf-ogsa-wsr f-basic-profile/en/39
(2) Submit OGSA WSRF BP 1.0 (v043) to GGF Editor this Friday Given that OGSA Basic Security Profiles need more time to complete (maybe after GGF15), we agreed to submit OGSA WSRF BP 1.0 alone to GGF Editor this Friday. If you have any farther comments on this draft, please let us know before EoB Friday (Sept. 23).
Thanks,