The "Need a fault to return an alternative EPI <https://forge.gridforum.org/sf/go/artf5586;jsessionid=CA2BE28DFE0C0EF30A18E0E080AA4A43?nav=1>" is tracker artf5586 and indeed requires a decision. What is the other one? (i believe artf3070 is taken care of already, isn't it?) Note that we do not need any telcon if my persuasive, real-world and well-described use cases for the "Need a fault to return an alternative EPI <https://forge.gridforum.org/sf/go/artf5586;jsessionid=CA2BE28DFE0C0EF30A18E0E080AA4A43?nav=1>" have convinced everybody that it is a great idea to add that option to the spec... If not, I'd appreciate an email discussion to speed things up as it would be great to get this spec out of the door!!! Thanks, Frank. David Snelling wrote:
Folks,
I have consolidated all outstanding issues into the tracker:
https://forge.gridforum.org/sf/tracker/do/listArtifacts/projects.ogsa- naming-wg/tracker.naming_comments_by_frank
There are only two that I believe require decisions. Andrew can we have a cll next week and close these out.
-- Frank Siebenlist franks@mcs.anl.gov The Globus Alliance - Argonne National Laboratory