Just a comment of the WSRF BP submission to the GGF editors. I am in favor of option 1 simply because I don't see a point of releasing a profile that "very likely" nobody is going to use. I know there are some implementations of the referenced specification out there, but in my view people will find it more efficient to move to the latest versions of the specifications that to try to be compliant with an older version of a profile that is going to be changed soon. Anyway the wait is almost over! Abdeslem /////////// -----Original Message----- From: owner-ogsa-wg@ggf.org [mailto:owner-ogsa-wg@ggf.org]On Behalf Of Andreas Savva Sent: Friday, June 10, 2005 11:12 AM To: 'ogsa-wg' Subject: [ogsa-wg] Teleconference minutes - 8 June 2005 Minutes attached. Outline: * Document review process * WSRF Basic Profile (BP) review * Roadmap review Gridforge: http://tinyurl.com/5fxfd/minutes-20050608/en/1 -- Andreas Savva Fujitsu Laboratories Ltd