Andreas, I like an option publishing the Glossary out-of-sync. Thanks, ---- Hiro Kishimoto -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re:[ogsa-wg] Link to OGF Errata process From: Andreas Savva <andreas.savva@jp.fujitsu.com> To: Hiro Kishimoto <hiro.kishimoto@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Mailing List for OGSA-WG <ogsa-wg@ogf.org>, Greg Newby <newby@arsc.edu> Date: 2007/07/11 12:49
Hiro,
We talked about a few other options including only making those changes to the Data section that would bring it into alignment with the Glossary. I think that could easily fall in the editorial or minor technical fixes category.
Anywya, I don't really see any urgency to produce a new version of the OGSA Architecture document at this point; especially if the main trigger for it is the Glossary! At the moment I am leaning more towards the idea of publishing the Glossary out-of-sync; or even to leave it as a stable group-internal document for now. The second option might not be very nice to Jem given all the work he put in.
Andreas
Hiro Kishimoto wrote:
Thanks Andreas,
Following up on the discussion we had on the Glossary call the proposed OGF Errata process is available on the OGF Editor project: https://forge.gridforum.org/sf/projects/ggf-editor The topics we've discussed at the call are; (a) Revising Data Service section (3.5 page 28-36) reflecting recent development of OGSA-data WG's data architecture document. and, (b) Adding new reference model section reflecting consolidation discussion with reference model WG.
They are obviously not either (1) Editorial fixes or (2) Minor technical fixes defined by Greg's errata process. Thus they fall in (3) Major technical fixes category.
The OGF Editor suggests two options;
there will need to be a decision whether to fix the document, or instead seek to write an updated document that will obsolete the old document. This decision will be made in cooperation with authors/ editors, the OGF Editor, the cognizant area directors, and GFSG (others as needed). Although the Editor allows errata process for Major technical fixes, I prefer to write an new version of the document since proposed modifications, (a) and (b), are improvements but not *error* at all.
Just my two cents. Thanks, ---- Hiro Kishimoto
-------- Original Message -------- Subject: [ogsa-wg] Link to OGF Errata process From: Andreas Savva <andreas.savva@jp.fujitsu.com> To: Mailing List for OGSA-WG <ogsa-wg@ogf.org> Date: 2007/07/10 14:58
Following up on the discussion we had on the Glossary call the proposed OGF Errata process is available on the OGF Editor project: https://forge.gridforum.org/sf/projects/ggf-editor
The direct link is http://forge.ogf.org/short/ggf-editor/errata