On Mon, 2005-02-28 at 14:38 -0800, Frank Siebenlist wrote:
Could anyone summarize MS' WS-view, and how it differs from WSRF?
So far I have not seen any substantial difference between the two approaches and I definitely believe the onus is on MS to show why people should adopt their proprietary specifications vs. adopting something that is being developed in a open standards body, is getting very close to a 1.0 version and has multiple implementations behind it. /Sam
Thanks, Frank.
Hiro Kishimoto wrote:
Hi all,
Absorbing article by Tony Hey.
http://news.tgc.com/nview.jsp?appid=360&print=1#342708 ---- Hiro Kishimoto
GRIDtoday NEWS AND INFORMATION FOR THE GLOBAL GRID COMMUNITY --- February 28, 2005: Vol. 4, No. 8 --- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ SPECIAL FEATURES ==============================================================
[ ] M342708 ) WSRF? WS-*? Where is GGF's OGSA Headed? By Tony Hey, Contributing Editor
Tony Hey, director of e-Science for the Engineering and Physical Science Research Council, continues to elaborate the need for open standards in the realm of Web services-based Grid computing. He discusses the great debate of WSRF vs. WS-*, and lays out what the
GGF
must do with OGSA in order to give e-Science application developers something to rally around.
-- Sam Meder <meder@mcs.anl.gov> The Globus Alliance - University of Chicago 630-252-1752