Hi Rachana, that's great news, thanks. Please, by all means do forward the mail to the Globus discussion lists as you see fit. As for the C developers, I do not have an explicit document; I plan to obtain the original Word document, and change that one more or less on the fly. All I have at the moment are the sketches in my previous mails. Cheers, Michel On 19 May 2008, at 16:08, Rachana Ananthakrishnan wrote:
Hi Michel,
Thanks for the note, have been on work travel and vacation all of last week.
Both recommendations seem fine to me. On the notification issue, I think Globus already expects that the topic will be a QName and complying with the profile requirements should be straightforward.
May I forward your previous email on this topic to globus discussion list? Is there an explicit document on this that I can forward to Globus developers working on C code?
Thanks, Rachana
-----Original Message----- From: Michel Drescher [mailto:Michel.Drescher@uk.fujitsu.com] Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 8:39 AM To: Rachana Ananthakrishnan Cc: ogsa-wg@ogf.org Subject: OGSA WSRF BP Interop
Hi Rachana,
as you were not on today's OGSA phone conference on the OGSA WSRF BP interop effort, we would like to ask your opinion on the following.
On the call the group agreed to change the WSRF Profile's resource properties "ResourcePropertyNames" and "WSResourceInterfaces" to the WSRF style of Resource Properties.
The group also discussed to proceed with the proposal on the WS- Notification issue, i.e. creating a profile-specific topic dialect as proposed on the Mailing List (respective E-Mail attached).
Based on your earlier comments we conjecture that you would not object, but we would like to solicit that before we proceed.