The correct xml type for IRIs is xsd:anyURI. Tom _______________________________________________ Tom Maguire +1(845) 729-4806 -----Original Message----- From: ogsa-naming-wg-bounces@ogf.org [mailto:ogsa-naming-wg-bounces@ogf.org] On Behalf Of Frank Siebenlist Sent: Monday, September 11, 2006 2:07 PM To: ogsa-naming-wg@ggf.org; OGSA WG Cc: Sam Sun Subject: [ogsa-naming-wg] ws-naming comments from Sam Sun (CNRI) A few comments from Sam Sun <ssun@cnri.reston.va.us>: <sam-quote>
For the naming-spec, I don't see any major issues. One item that might need to clearify is the mixed use of URI and IRI in the document. IRI can be seen as a super set of URI because of its relaxed syntax restriction. In section 4, it says
EPI ... "MUST conformto URI syntax [RFC3987]."
But RFC3987 is for the definition of IRI. I suppose the author(s) really meant the IRI here (which will also be my selection).
Such mixed use is also seen in a few examples given in the PortType definition (e.g. "5.1.1 <naming:endpoint-identifier>xsd:anyURI</naming:endpoint-identifier>").
I would suggest to go through the use of URI in the document and replace them with IRI when appropriate. </sam-quote>
Regards, Frank. -- Frank Siebenlist franks@mcs.anl.gov The Globus Alliance - Argonne National Laboratory -- ogsa-naming-wg mailing list ogsa-naming-wg@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogsa-naming-wg