Hi Just some fairly minor comments, othewise yea, go for it. I'll leave it up to Tom to decide on the 3 points below. Abdeslem ==================================================================== Section 2: line 184: should the conformance claim URI be "http://www.ggf.org/namespaces/2005/07/OGSAWSRFBasicProfile-1.0" and, I guess if we include WSRF here, all other namespaces (in schema) should also be changed. Section 4: line 267: DO you mean wsdl:Service or wsdl:Service/port? in WSDL 1.1 a Service can aggregate many ports. Anyway the sentence is not clear: "a list of all portTypes that were used to compose the wsdl:Service"? Do you mean the portTypes corresponding to different ports, or the list of known portTypes that were composed together to make a new portType for this Service/port? Section 4.4.1: line 366: RECOMMENDS should be MANDATES in order to be consistent with section 6.1 where the profile MANDATES the use NotificationProducer for notifications of events from resources. ==================================================================== Tom Maguire wrote:
https://forge.gridforum.org/projects/ogsa-wg/document/draft-ggf-ogsa-wsrf-ba...
The final call document for the OGSA WSRF Basic Profile 1.0 is available for download at the above link. Please review and positive acknowledge with an email to the mailing list with your vote (yea or nay) for submission from the workgroup to the GGF Editor. Please vote (email) by Friday, July 29th COB (EDT).
If your vote is 'nay' please include precise comments so that we may address any substantive issues you may have prior to submission.
Thanks, Tom
Frey’s Law: “Every 5 years the number of architecture components double and the ability to comprehend them halves”
Perfection is achieved, not when there is nothing more to add, but when there is nothing left to take away. – Antoine de Saint-Exupery
T o m M a g u i r e
STSM, On Demand Architecture
Poughkeepsie, NY 12601