May 2006 - ogsa-wg - lists.ogf.org

GGF17 Resource Management (Information Model) session minutes
by Fred Maciel 20 May '06

20 May '06

Hi, I just uploaded the minutes: https://forge.gridforum.org/projects/ogsa-wg/document/GGF17-OGSA-RM-minu tes/en Regards, Fred Maciel Hitachi America R&D The information contained in this communication is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and others authorized to receive it. It may contain confidential or legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action in Hitachi America, Ltd. on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and is unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by responding to this e-mail and then delete it from your system. Hitachi America, Ltd. is not liable for any improper and/or incomplete transmission of the information contained in this communication or for any delay in its receipt. Hitachi America, Ltd. is not responsible for any damage caused by malicious code or alteration by any third party. The contents of this e-mail do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Hitachi America, Ltd.

1 0

[ogsa-wg | Roadmap 1.1 - 1822] gap analysis
by Sourceforge Tracker Monitor 20 May '06

20 May '06

A new artifact has been added: 1822 Submitted by: Hiro Kishimoto Submitted date: 2006-05-20 09:50:39 Respond by visiting: https://forge.gridforum.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=815&aid=1822&group_id… (https://forge.gridforum.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=815&aid=1822&group_id…) Summary: gap analysis Project: Open Grid Services Architecture Tracker: Roadmap 1.1 Artifact ID: 1822 Category: <None> Group: <None> Status: Open Priority: 3 Last Modified By: Hiro Kishimoto Last Modified: 2006-05-20 09:50:39 Submitted By: Hiro Kishimoto Submit Date: 2006-05-20 09:50:39 Assigned To: Hiro Kishimoto File(s): <None> Description: It is recommended to add "gap analysis" to the roadmap document. For example, each OGSA capability has overview section and lists up major services and documents. If such services or documents are already taken care of any WGs, just refers to corresponding section. If not, this is a "gap" and encourage readers to fulfill such gaps. View the Roadmap 1.1 : https://forge.gridforum.org/tracker/index.php?func=browse&group_id=42&atid=… (https://forge.gridforum.org/tracker/index.php?func=browse&group_id=42&atid=…)

1 0

Naming Document
by Mark Morgan 19 May '06

19 May '06

A new version of the WS-Naming document has been uploaded to grid forge. This document incorporates changes which reflect discussions, both at GGF in Tokyo and on recent Naming telecons, that unify naming with the Web Services Endpoint Identification and Resolution Use Case informational document provided by David Snelling and Frank Siebenlist. Please check the new document out and comment as desired. -Mark

1 0

Teleconference minutes - 18 May 2006
by Andreas Savva 19 May '06

19 May '06

Minutes attached. https://forge.gridforum.org/projects/ogsa-wg/document/minutes-20060518/en/1 -- Andreas Savva Fujitsu Laboratories Ltd OGSA Teleconference - 18 May 2006 ================================= * Participants Mike Behrens (R2AD, LLC) Dona Dickinson (Northrop Grumman) Donal Fellows (UoM) Chris Jordan (SDSC) Hiro Kishimoto (Fujitsu) Tom Maguire (EMC) Andreas Savva (Fujitsu) David Snelling (Fujitsu) Ellen Stokes (IBM) Jem Treadwell (HP) Jay Unger (IBM) Minutes: Andreas Savva * April 27 Minutes - approved with no changes * Action item review (Only items with updates are listed below.) - Ellen will do an example of a cluster (e.g., the glue cluster model) and the 'red' to 'blue' mapping for it - Similar example produced as part of GGF17 document produced by Ellen. - (CLOSED) - Hiro and Jun will look at what needs to be provided as a set of common component models and make a proposal to the group. - Hiro and Jun produced some initial material which they presented at GGF. They will continue refining them and will review in future calls. - (CLOSED) - Manuel & Andrew to determine where/when to hold standard hierarchical namespaces discussions. - Chris Jordan gave a status update: A revised draft was produced by GFS-WG before GGF17. It was reviewed at GGF17. - Will give some time to OGSA-Naming-WG and OGSA-Data-WG to review and comment and if agreement is reached to submit to GGF Editor - Agreed to review document on next OGSA call (next Monday) - There is a need to check Andrew's and Manuel's availability - (CLOSED) - Steven Newhouse to ask Jennifer Schopf on the status of the GIN modeling document. - Obsolete. - (CLOSED) * GGF17 review - Postponed minutes approval: the Information Model minutes have not been uploaded yet and many people have not had a chance to read the EMS minutes yet. ** OGSA & Alternative Architectures session - Andreas has asked the panel organizer to upload the slides. One idea is to treat them as public comments to OGSA 1.5. - Clarified that OGSA-WG still has to get separate permission to do so. - It was an interesting panel. It was good to hear the opinions of people not directly involved in OGSA. - Despite the title there was really no discussion of an alternative architecture. It would be interesting to actually talk about alternatives that are not just 'plain web services'. - OGSA also seems to have more potential support within GGF. Dave Snelling will explore this more. * Roadmap 1.1 Jem cannot take on new work at this time though he will continue to be involved in the WG. A call for volunteers for Roadmap editor resulted in three people volunteering to help out. - Agreed to make a final choice next call (Monday) - Once a selection is made there should be a discussion on what needs to be done, how to hand over work, and how to start working on the document. - Agreed on having a separate call between current and next editors to hand over work and assign responsibilites. Jem has a list of things that should be done for the next version and he will share it with the next editor. For example, what is the relation with the GGF live-charter (is design team output properly represented on the live-charter; the live-charter does not have dependencies recorded---too complex; and so on.) Hiro said that a Gap analysis section might be a good addition to the Roadmap document. * OGSA & Glossary 1.5 - Public comment period ended May 9 with no comments. Since then Jem has uploaded some comments from Olegario; and Andreas has put a comment about the 'Alternative Architectures' panel--but still need permission of presenters to use their slides as comments. - Put the Glossary again on next Monday's call, if agenda allows. - Agreed to ask particular people to review and comment: - Ian Foster (Andreas to ask) - Jeff Frey (Jay to ask) - Marvin Theimer (Hiro to ask) * OGSA Security Profiles They are in public comment. There is one comment from Marty Humphrey so far. * Webcast Jem has received feedback and will forward it out to the OGSA list * F2F Planning Discussed using Google Calendar to manage OGSA-WG schedule and planning for F2F. - Andreas will create an OGSA-WG calendar by Monday. Seed it with some known events - Set it up to send calendar invitations to the ogsa-wg list (so needs to have a gmail account) to make it easy for people to register events in the private calendars. - Allow people to subscribe to it (and publish to it). Also support a completely public view not requiring having a google account. Discussed possible dates for summer F2F. - End of june, before of after HPDC in Europe is one possibility that was rejected in the past. - First option: Week of July 17 at Chicago - Possible for most people on the call - (Donal cannot make July at all) - Hiro/Jay to ask Ian Foster and Steve Tuecke whether they can attend. - Chosing Chicago in order to get more Globus participation. Chris Jordan will also ask his Globus contacts if they can participate. - Tried to determine a second option in August but there was no consensus. Many people plan to be on holiday. Actions: - Hiro to do the usual Zoomerang - Andreas to set up a Google calendar * OASIS SDD TC report Hiro reported on the SDD F2F: - The minutes and related materials are available from the SDD TC site (see also Hiro's email on the list). - Identified and discussed overlap with ACS, CDL, and partly with OGSA EMS, JSDL. - SDD TC decided to base their specification on the IBM/Macrovision submission - IUDD V2. And this is a lot different from the GGF specs. - They did agree to converge this spec with the ACS specification. This effort looks like 'low-hanging fruit'. - They are interested in the resource requirements in JSDL and the information model work done in OGSA-WG. - There are considerable problems with CDDLM stemming from different models (e.g., different lifecycle model) - They are interested in some parts of CDL and may borrow ideas but SDD V1 is likely to be very different. - It is a good sign that they are interested in working with us on converging the various specifications. One unclear issue from Hiro's explanation is the extent to which the SDD (IUDD) spec will try to duplicate existing descriptions. (Is it a 'collector' of existing descriptions or does it duplicate and replace existing descriptors?) - Some degree of 'denormalization' (information existing in the native package also appearing in the /canonicalized meta-data description/ in SDD) is not a problem. But if the intention is to replace all existing deployers/installers they are likely to run into a host of other (political) problems. - Since it is unlikely to have a single deployment descriptor there is a need to make sure that kind of thinking is incorporated.

1 0

FW: Evaluation of the Grid webcast
by Treadwell, Jem 18 May '06

18 May '06

Hi, below is the feedback we received from a follow-up survey of webcast participants. The next-to-last question was a "check all that apply" question, so I think the 30 responses really means that the 14 respondents checked a total of 30 boxes. Note that the "future topics" question at the end includes requests for more info from OGSA and from other working groups. - Jem > The session had 138 registrants and 61 classroom attendees. > > Attendees included one or more representatives from the following > businesses and universtities: AAA Computing, ACET Centre University > of Reading, Acxiom, Anydata Limited, Aricie, AT&T, BAE, CA, CERN, > Choreology Ltd, Cisco, commerx, COS, CS a.s.,CUC, DCT, Dell. Deloitte, > Deutscher Wetterdienst, Digital Enterprise Research Institute, Digital > Impact, FGAN, Fujitsu Siemens Computers, FZK, Gatech, Georgia State > University, GGF, GPPD-UFRGS, Gridcore AB, Gridguru, GSI, Hitachi Data > Systems, HPI University of Potsdam, Huawei Tech, IBM, Illinois > Institute of Technology, Imperial, INAF, Iowa State University, KISTI, > KTH, Lemko, Lund University, MAC Holdings (Pvt) Ltd., Mississippi > State University, Nagoya Institute of Technology, National University > of Defense Technology, NCHC, NCR, Network Appliance Inc., NICTA, > Northrop Grumman, NUST Institute of IT, Oak Ridge National Lab, OCL > USA Inc, Oklahoma State University, Oracle, OSU Stillwater, Otago > Polytechnic, Platform Computing, R2AD, Rochester Institute of > Technology, SAS Institute, School of EEE Nanyang Technological > University, SDSC, SGT, SJTU, Softbank BB Corp., Software Perspectives, > Sony Computer Entertainment, Soongsil University, Source Media, Sun > Microsystems Inc., SURA, SURA, Swiss Inst. of Bioinformatics, Synnex > Corp., Tabor Communications, TACC, Telcordia Technologies, The George > Washington University, TNO I&T, TU Delft, TUM, UCSF, University of > Amsterdam, University of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences > Center, University of Hamburg, University of Michigan, University of > Naples, University of Reading, University of Southampton, Vision > Solutions Inc., Wireless Grids Co., Xyratex, Zhejiang University, Zuse > Institute Berlin. > > The playback is posted at: > http://www.presentationselect.com/HPinvent/archive.asp?eventid=1188 > > Results of the polls were as follows: > > Question Total > Responses Responses Number % of Total > How familiar are you with OGSA? (choose one) 33 Very familiar > 5 15% > Somewhat familiar 10 30% > Limited knowledge 13 39% > No knowledge 5 15% > > What drives your interest in OGSA? (choose one) 32 > Application manager, architect or developer 19 59% > Grid software developer or provider 18 56% > Active member of GGF 8 25% > Member of standards dev't organization other than GGF > 4 12% > Student 5 15% > Press/analyst 0 0% > > > Results of the evaluation were as follows: > > Question Total > Responses Responses Number % of Total > The webcast was very informative 14 Strongly agree 7 > 50% > Agree 6 42.9% > Neutral 1 7.1% > Disagree 0 0.0% > Strongly disagree 0 0.0% > > The webcast provided me with content that I will be able to use in my > work 14 Strongly agree 2 14.3% > Agree 8 57.1% > Neutral 4 28.6% > Disagree 0 0.0% > Strongly disagree 0 0.0% > > Attending the webcast was a valuable use of my time 14 Strongly > agree 5 35.7% > Agree 8 57.1% > Neutral 1 7.1% > Disagree 0 0.0% > Strongly disagree 0 0.0% > > I would recommend the Invent Online series to my colleagues 14 > Strongly agree 6 42.9% > Agree 8 57.1% > Neutral 0 0.0% > Disagree 0 0.0% > Strongly disagree 0 0.0% > > Based either on what you learned in this broadcast or what you already > knew about OGSA: do you think that OGSA technical direction will > establish architecture and specifications that will help your > organization and others to build real grids? (choose one) 14 > Strongly agree 5 35.7% > Somewhat agree 6 42.9% > Neither agree nor disagree 1 7.1% > Somewhat disagree 0 0.0% > Strongly disagree 0 0.0% > Don't know enough 2 14.3% > > Do you think that OGSA effectively blends the technical requirements > and use cases of eScience and eBusiness grids? (choose one) 14 > Strongly agree 3 21.4% > Somewhat agree 6 42.9% > Neither agree nor disagree 3 21.4% > Somewhat disagree 0 0.0 > Strongly disagree 0 0.0% > Don't know enough 2 > > What effects do you think the "open" process that GGF and OGSA follows > has on the definition of architecture and specifications (choose all > that apply 30 Delays or lengthens the process of > standardization too much 0 0.0% > Produces architecture and specifications that do not > provide sufficient detail for realistic implementations 1 > 3.3% > Depends too much on other standards or the work of other > standard bodies 3 10.0% > Produces architecture and specifications that > successfully incorporate the grid community's ideas and requirements > 9 30.0% > Produces specifications that will eventually be adopted > and complied with by most grid software developers 8 26.7% > Produces specifications and architecture that will > promote the interoperability and integration of grid software > components from multiple sources 9 30.0% > > What topics would you like to have discussed in future webcasts > * virtualization survey, comparing technologies single sign-on > security - implications for apps and customers. > * comparison of ETL tools > * More technical information on OGSA. > * Grid Computing Scientific/Business Workflow systems] > * Interview of the following GGF workgroups : -DAIS-WG; -DFDL-WG; > > >

1 0

Refactored RNS Specification - Post GG17 Discussion
by Christopher Jordan 18 May '06

18 May '06

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 This is the most recent version of the refactored RNS hierarchical namespace document. Please read it if you get a chance so that we can discuss it at the next OGSA call. Begin forwarded message: > From: Manuel Pereira <mpereira(a)almaden.ibm.com> > Date: May 11, 2006 11:58:56 AM PDT > To: gfs-wg(a)ggf.org > Cc: ogsa-naming-wg(a)ggf.org > Subject: [gfs-wg] Refactored RNS Specification - Post GG17 Discussion > > > Hello all, > > This note is intended to inform you that the most recent revision > of the "refactored" RNS specification document is now available on > GridForge: > https://forge.gridforum.org/projects/gfs-wg/document/ > Resource_Namespace_Service_Refactored/en/4 > > This revision incorporates the very minor adjustments discussed > during the GFS-WG session in Tokyo. > > Best regards, > Manuel Pereira > ------------------------------------------------------ > IBM Almaden Research Center > 1-408-927-1935 [Tieline: 457] > mpereira(a)us.ibm.com > ------------------------------------------------------ - ---------------------------------------------------- Chris Jordan HPC Systems Engineer High End Computing Systems Group San Diego Supercomputer Center ctjordan(a)sdsc.edu 858.534.8347 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQFEbHs5PCVtcXn6kg8RAlf4AJ9+dnkDS8sGNeQpYwIb7Lhgh6+7DwCbBwXN NDRm7trP2eh5jpeMGGEuowM= =8JqJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

OASIS Solution Deployment Descriptor TC
by Hiro Kishimoto 18 May '06

18 May '06

Hi all, OASIS OASIS Solution Deployment Descriptor TC is developing XML schema for deployment related metadata of multiple software packages (they call solution). Their scope is widely overlapped with CDDLM, ACS, JSDL, and OGSA-EMS. In order to prevent from undesirable divergence, Keisuke Fukui (ACS-WG co-chair) and I have attended to SDD TC F2F meeting this week, introduced our CDDLM/ACS/JSDL specs and ask them to utilize these GGF specifications if appropriate. http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/18091/ggf-sdd-submission.… http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/18167/GGF-spec-submission… The F2F meeting went very well and SDD TC agreed that although they chose IUDD V2 specification as their base specification, they will align and converge with ACS/JSDL/CDDLM specs in long team and also short term. It is very good news for both GGF and OASIS. http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/18210/SDDF2F.html http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/18208/Strategy%20for%20De… http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/18209/Deployment%20Descri… If time permits, I will report out and answer questions on this new thrilling opportunity at Thursday's OGSA-WG weekly call. Thanks, -- Hiro Kishimoto

1 0

CFP GridNets 2006 : Extended Deadline
by Antoine.Pichot＠alcatel.fr 17 May '06

17 May '06

Call for Papers =============== GridNets 2006 Third International Workshop on Networks for Grid Applications Co-Sponsored by IEEE Communications Society and Create-Net Co-located with IEEE Communications Society/Create-Net Broadnets 2006 San Jose, California, USA, October 1-2, 2006 http://www.gridnets.org Grid developers and practicioners are increasingly realising the importance of an efficient network support. Entire classes of applications would greatly benefit by a network-aware Grid middleware, able to effectively manage the network resource in terms of scheduling, access and use. Conversely, the peculiar requirements of Grid applications provide stimulating drivers for new challenging research towards the development of Grid-aware networks. Cooperation between Grid middleware and network infrastructure driven by a common control plane is a key factor to effectively empower the global Grid platform for the execution of network-intensive applications, requiring massive data transfers, very fast and low-latency connections, and stable and guaranteed transmission rates. Big e-science projects, as well as industrial and engineering applications for data analysis, image processing, multimedia, or visualisation just to name a few are awaiting an efficient Grid network support. They would be boosted by a global Grid platform enabling end-to-end dynamic bandwidth allocation, broadband and low-latency access, interdomain access control, and other network performance monitoring capabilities. The Gridnets 2006 workshop will provide a focused and highly interactive forum where researchers and technologists will have the opportunity to present and discuss leading research, developments, and future directions in the Grid networking area. As an IEEE publication, the proceedings will also be accessible through the IEEE Xplore website and other digital libraries. Best papers will be considered for publication in a special section of Elsevier Future Generation Computer Systems (FGCS) - The International Journal of Grid Computing: Theory, Methods and Application". Scope ------ The GridNets 2006 workshop will focus on research issues and challenges as well as lessons learned from experience. Topics of interest include and are not limited to: * New concepts and requirements to shape the design of eScience and Research Networks * Integration of advanced optical networking technologies and architectures (OPS, OBS) for the Grid environment * Coordination of network resources with other Grid resources (CPU, Storage) * Layer interactions: optical layer with higher layer protocols * Grid advanced resource reservation * Self-healing Grid networks * Traffic characteristics and performance analysis * New architectures and technologies that address Grid requirements * Experience on production-level optical network infrastructures * Middleware design and grid layer integration issues for accessing and managing network resources * Routing and scheduling for dynamic bandwidth control * Monitoring, provisioning, brokering of network resources * New multi-service frameworks and models * End-to-end application level control of network resource * Peer-to-peer approach for Grid networks * Network support for wireless Grids * Novel data transport protocols designed for new application services * Data replication and multicasting strategies and protocols * Fault-tolerance, protection, security, and scalability issues related to connecting large number of sites * Network cost, performance, and incentive issues * Grid network simulation * Identification of Grid peculiarities that network mechanisms can build upon Important Dates ----------------- Paper Submission ** Extended Deadline ** : June 7, 2006 Paper Acceptance Notification: June 30, 2006 Final paper submission: July 31, 2006 (For submission instructions, refer to http://www.gridnets.org ) Organizing Committee ==================== Workshop co-chairs: Pascale Vicat-Blanc Primet (ENS Lyon), Michael Welzl (University of Innsbruck) Workshop vice-chair: Piero Spinnato (Create-Net) Technical Program Committee chairs: Wayne Clark (Cisco), Yufeng Xin (MCNC) Panel chair: Bela Berde (Alcatel) Publicity chair: Antoine Pichot (Europe) (Alcatel), Tomohiro Kudoh (Asia) (AIST), Brian Tierny (USA) (LBL) Steering Committee: Imrich Chlamtac (Create-Net), Gigi Karmous-Edwards (MCNC), Michael Welzl (University of Innsbruck) Conference coordination and registration: Kitti H. Kovacs (ICST) Program Committee ================= Bill Allcock - Argonne National Lab Micah Beck - University of Tennessee Augusto Casaca - INESC Piero Castoldi - Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna Cees De Laat - Universiteit van Amsterdam Peter Dinda - Northwestern University Jose Fernandes - FCCN Tiziana Ferrari - INFN - CNAF Gabriele Garzoglio - Fermi National Accelerator Lab Wolfgang Gentzsch - D-Grid Wolfgang Gerteis - SAP Belfast Doan Hoang - University of Technology, Sydney David Hutchison - Lancaster University Adriana Iamnitchi - University of South Florida Admela Jukan - Universite de Quebec Jussi Kangasharju - Technical University Darmstadt Gigi Karmous-Edwards - MCNC Dieter Kranzlmüller - University of Linz Joe Mambretti - Northwestern Univ Max Mühlhäuser - Technical University Darmstadt Nicholas Race - Lancaster University Matei Ripeanu - University of British Columbia Volker Sander - University of Applied Sciences Aachen Dimitra Simeonidou - University of Essex Oliver Yu - University of Illinois at Chicago

1 0

Proposed agenda for May 18 call
by Hiro Kishimoto 16 May '06

16 May '06

Hi all, The following is a proposed agenda for OGSA-WG telecon on May 18th Thursday from 8:30am - 10:30am (CDT). Dial-in numbers for Thursday: Free: +1-888-452-0308 Intl/Toll: +1-484-644-0505 PIN: 71815 Screen share service will be provided. URL: http://ogsa.glance.net Session key: 0518 See more explanation: http://www-unix.gridforum.org/mail_archive/ogsa-wg/2004/06/msg00077.html 1) Early discussion (20 min) Note taker assignment Roll call Telecon minutes approval (April 27) https://forge.gridforum.org/projects/ogsa-wg/document/minutes-20060427/en/1 Action Items status review (see the bottom of this email) Agenda bashing 2) GGF17 review (20 min) OGSA sessions minutes approval Any comments on GGF17 3) OGSA roadmap document authorship (20 min) We need new co-editors for roadmap document Discuss how to take it over from Jem 4) OGSA 1.5 Architecture and glossary public comments (20 min) We need to solicit more comments for Arch doc and glossary. 5) OGSA-WG and the fellow WGs August F2F meeting plan (20 min) As we discussed at the GGF17 in Tokyo, Andreas will set up gCalendar and let you know the process for pick F2F date. 6) Wrap up (10 min) AOB <*NEXT CALL*> May 22 (Mon): OGSA Information Model (Ellen and Fred), Telecon schedule in the future May 25 (Thu): OGSA EMS architecture scenarios (Steven), OGSA authorization call-out proposal review (Frank) <*ACTION ITEMS*> From April 27 call - Ellen will do an example of a cluster (e.g., the glue cluster model) and the 'red' to 'blue' mapping for it From April 24 call - Frank to write up and send to the list a one page summary of the authorization call-out proposal. From April 6 F2F meeting - Hiro and Jun will look at what needs to be provided as a set of common component models and make a proposal to the group. From April 5 F2F meeting - Marvin to send e-mail that explains concerns on compliance suite by GGF & EGA. - Manuel & Andrew to determine where/when to hold standard hierarchical namespaces discussions. From April 4 F2F meeting - Steven Newhouse to ask Jennifer Schopf on the status of the GIN modeling document. Deferred - Jay check and find out relatively small funding to Globus to develop document on their security work (April 6 F2F) - Hiro to schedule a discussion in the OGSA F2F after the converged specs drafts are released to discuss which sets of specs to use within OGSA. (April 4 F2F) -- Hiro Kishimoto

1 0

OGSA Roadmap editor
by Treadwell, Jem 15 May '06

15 May '06

Hi, It's now 9 months since we published the OGSA Roadmap v1.0, and we need to begin work on the next version. However, because of other commitments I won't be able to serve as co-editor for this version. If anyone would like to volunteer for this role, would you please let me and Hiro know? Thanks! - Jem ________________________________ Jem Treadwell Hewlett-Packard Company 6000 Irwin Road Mount Laurel, NJ 08054 Phone: 856-638-6021 Fax: 856-638-6190 E-mail: Jem.Treadwell(a)hp.com <mailto:Jem.Treadwell@hp.com>

1 0