Hi Donal, Let me make myself clear. In the following sentence, "CGS & ESP recommendation specifications" are intented to mean RSS-WG's two main deliverables. 1. D1: Specification of CSG interface and protocol 2. D2: Specification of EPS interface and protocol If you think these terms are not interchangable, we should use "D1 and D2" instead. IMHO, it is very important and should be clearly stated in the charter document that RSS-WG and OGSA-WG will collaborate and have a joint review to develop specifications which are manure, consisitent, fit well in the OGSA EMS architecture. Thanks, ---- Hiro Kishimoto Donal K. Fellows wrote:
Hiro Kishimoto wrote:
Actually this sentence means that OGSA-WG will have joint review only on service description but don't on CGS/ESP interface and protocol specifications. I think this is wrong.
May I propose one more time;
"we will provide and have a joint review of a service description (as an informational document) and of CGS & ESP recommendation specifications.
I do not think it is necessary to be *that* specific in the charter. It's not a deliverable, after all. :^)
Donal.