Steven Newhouse wrote:
I've updated the Advanced Filter specification to include a mechanism to retrieve dynamic attributes from a node:
https://forge.gridforum.org/sf/docman/do/downloadDocument/projects.ogsa-hpcp...
Comments welcome.
Minor nits: In the "Status of this Memo" section on the front page, you've got "Advacned" instead of "Advanced". In the paragraph at the top of page 4, you've got "activies" instead of "activities". In the paragraph describing "/hpcp-af:UserName" you've got "derivied" instead of "derived". In the paragraph describing "/hpcp-af:Owner" (also pp.4) you've got "activites" instead of "activities". In the description of "/hpcp-af:CompactResources" you've got "muti" and "mulit" instead of "multi" and you probably should use "head-node" instead of "headnode". Major point: Is there a reason for not using the elements from the Usage Record v1.0 specification in there? I can understand not wanting to necessarily provide a full UR, but it'd be a good idea for at least the elements to be semantically compatible. (As a separate point, it's not exactly clear to me what the meaning of "free memory" is; operating systems do some funny tricks there.) Donal.