Subject: RE: [Fwd: FW: SC06 Demo Kickoff]
From: Richard Ciapala <[email-masked]>
To: Christopher Smith <[email-masked]>, David Snelling <[email-masked]>, "Peter G. Lane" <[email-masked]>
Cc: "Mark M. Morgan" <[email-masked]>, Marty Humphrey <[email-masked]>, "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>, "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>, Moreno Marzolla <[email-masked]>, "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>, Michel Drescher <[email-masked]>, Vivian Li <[email-masked]>, Andreas Savva <[email-masked]>, Sven van den Berghe <[email-masked]>, "Ming Xu (WINDOWS)" <[email-masked]>, Ian Foster <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 10:03:59 -0700

Hi,

Based on the mails over the last few days, here's an agenda for today's call:

- Agree on agenda
- Agree on using existing HPC Profile mailing list for SC06 demo discussions
- Agree on new conf call time
- Reminder to send target toolset, OS and scheduler for the SC06 demo to richci
- Agree on WS-Addressing version for SC06 demo
- Discuss security mechanism for SC06 demo
- Discuss first deliverable and testing

Please let me know if I should add anything

Thanks

-----Original Message-----
From: Christopher Smith [mailto:[email-masked]]
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2006 9:36 AM
To: David Snelling; Peter G. Lane
Cc: Richard Ciapala; Mark M. Morgan; Marty Humphrey; [email-masked]; [email-masked]; Moreno Marzolla; [email-masked]; Michel Drescher; Vivian Li; Andreas Savva; Sven van den Berghe; Ian Foster
Subject: Re: [Fwd: FW: SC06 Demo Kickoff]

+1

It will also provide an archive of discussions for OGF to refer to when refining specs later.

-- Chris

On 22/9/06 08:41, "David Snelling" <[email-masked]> wrote:

> Folks,
>
> With my OGF Process hat on: We should probably just be using the hpcp
> wg list. The traffic is not that high and nothing much else is
> happening on that list.
>
> On 22 Sep 2006, at 16:31, Peter G. Lane wrote:
>
>> David Snelling wrote:
>>> Folks,
>>> The email list keeps getting corrected and growing. Please use the
>>> above in future (until it grows again).
>>
>> Perhaps someone should just setup a real (i.e. majordomo or the
>> like) email list for two months so people don't get dropped
>> accidentally. I could probably get one setup as long as nobody minds
>> it being @globus.org. The other thing is that we haven't officially
>> decided whether we will be able to participate, so perhaps someone
>> else should do this instead.
>>
>> Peter