November 2007 - ogsa-hpcp-wg

HPCBP Flyer for SC07
by Steven Newhouse 08 Nov '07

08 Nov '07

Minor change from yesterdays version. This is probably it - final call on the telecom [which is in 20 mins]. Steven

1 0

File staging extension
by Andrew Grimshaw 07 Nov '07

07 Nov '07

All, Today we discussed which URI's to support in the proposed file staging extensions. Particularly for SC07. I suggest the following URI's ftp http mailto because they do not require us to address the issue of delegation in advance of SC07. (As I said at the last OGF I do not think the delegation approach in the delegation proposal is a good idea). Of course I think ByteIO/RNS is a good idea - but I don't expect much support for that. (We support it.) Note that there exists a standard format for an ftp URI which includes username/password. Therefore one could include the information in the JSDL document without any need for delegation. (I do not know gridFTP well, perhaps it supports a similar set of uri options, eliminating the need for passing a delegated credential.) On the other hand if we choose to support gridFTP, scp, or any other protocol that requires a delegated credential, then we must also agree on a delegation strategy . with a potential need to replace it later. (By the way, we are not familiar with a standard URI format for scp.) Right now we (the Virginia Genesis II group) support ftp, http, mailto, and RNS with delegated credentials (not via the same mechanism Marty is proposing). A

8 10

UNICORE Client - CreamBes server
by Mohammad Shahbaz Memon 07 Nov '07

07 Nov '07

Hi All, I would like to announce that UNICORE client and CREAMBes server are successfully tested. I have updated the status on wiki. Regards -- ------------------ Mohammad Shahbaz Memon Distributed Systems and Grid Computing (VSGC) Jülich Supercomputing Center (JSC) Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH Jülich Germany

1 0

Compliance tester with X509 support
by Paolo Andretto 07 Nov '07

07 Nov '07

Hi all We (CREAM-BES team) are facing several problems with the new authentication support of the compliance tester based on X509 certificates. If we undestand correctly the client uses a self-signed certificate for the authentication and the gLite security infrastructure (trustmanager, LCAS/LCMAPS) seems not to allow that kind of credential. Is it possible for the client to have its own certificate signed by the certificate above (acting in this case as a CA certificate)? Thanks Paolo

3 5

Telecon - November 8th 2007
by Steven Newhouse 06 Nov '07

06 Nov '07

Time: 9.30AM (Pacific), 12.30PM (East Coast), 5.30PM (UK) Call details: PIN - 2719140 USA: 866 500 6738 UK +44 118 909 2000 I'll try and supply further local numbers if people require them. Agenda 1. OGF IPR Notice 2. Agenda Bashing 3. Report on SC07 Demos (All) 4. Experiences document additions 5. Any Other Business

1 0

SC07 Demo Sheet
by Steven Newhouse 06 Nov '07

06 Nov '07

All, Attached is a revised version of the flyer. I've moved text onto the wiki page - below. Please send comments ASAP. I need booth locations & activity from EGEE (all flavours), Platform, GridSAM, University of VIrginia (both activities). If you can update the wiki page - found from www.ogf.org/HPCBasicProfile<http://www.ogf.org/HPCBasicProfile> or send me details. I'd like to close this by first thing Wednesday morning. Thanks, Steven

2 1

HPC Basic Profile SC07 Demo
by Steven Newhouse 06 Nov '07

06 Nov '07

Attached is an updated press release and flyer for SC07 for the HPCBP interop demo. Stuff in italics still needs to be updated. Comments and contributions welcome. Steven

4 3

Un-edited or approved minutes
by Andrew Grimshaw 01 Nov '07

01 Nov '07

1 0

HPCBP Experiences Document
by Steven Newhouse 01 Nov '07

01 Nov '07

Some change tracked changes with comments. Steven

2 2

HPC Base Profile experiences document
by Glenn Wasson 01 Nov '07

01 Nov '07

All, Attached is a draft of the HPC Basic Profile experiences document that we have been working on as part of the OGF document process. Please read as we will be discussing this document on the call tomorrow. If you are interested in contributing to this document, I need 3 things: 1. corrected / additional information for the implementers table in section 2. I did not know the exact software stack for everyone listed there and it is possible that other groups have done interop testing that I am unaware of. 2. does section 3 reflect your experience? 3. did you encounter any issues and resolutions that you think should be added to section 4? Thanks, Glenn

2 1