Good comments! Yes, I think that
they should go in as comments from this WG. If the authors update
the table on page 13 as suggested, we are going to have to work with them
on the maturity column.
FYI, your comments have a few typos
in them.
Allen Luniewski
IBM Cross Brand Services
IBM Silicon Valley Laboratory
555 Bailey Ave.
San Jose, CA 95141
408-463-2255
408-930-1844 (mobile)
"Dave Berry"
<daveb@nesc.ac.uk> Sent by: ogsa-d-wg-bounces@ogf.org
02/08/2007 03:04 PM
To
"OGSA Data WG" <ogsa-d-wg@ogf.org>
cc
David E Martin/Chicago/IBM@IBMUS
Subject
[OGSA-D-WG] Response to the TSC Strategy
Document
The OGF Technology Strategy Committee have produced
a draft strategy
document for the OGF as a whole. None of the data area directors
or
co-chairs are listed among the authors and I think the document needs
some remedial attention in the data area. The document is now in
public
comment so we have very little time to catch problems.
I've had look through and have listed the changes I think are needed. I
attach these as a text file. Please take a look and let me know what
you think. Should we submit some of these on behalf of the OGSA Data
WG?
(A couple of my comments lie outwith the data area. I've put these
in
parentheses and would not include them in any response from the group as
a whole).
Best wishes,
Dave Berry
Deputy Director, Research & E-infrastructure Development
National e-Science Centre, 15 South College Street
Edinburgh, EH8 9AA Tel: +44 131 651
4039
[attachment "draft-ogf-tsc-strategy-1.0.pdf" deleted by Allen
Luniewski/Almaden/IBM] [attachment "TSC notes.txt" deleted by
Allen Luniewski/Almaden/IBM] --
ogsa-d-wg mailing list
ogsa-d-wg@ogf.org
http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogsa-d-wg