I uploaded a changed BES draft (we are now on version 33). This draft has the freshly cleansed wsdl and xsd from Rich. As was agreed unanimously on the telecon last week, I believe that this means that we are ready for public comment. -Mark -- Mark Morgan Research Scientist Department of Computer Science University of Virginia http://www.cs.virginia.edu mmm2a@virginia.edu (434) 982-2047
Mark, Stephen was so kind to take care that the doc moved forward in the editor pipeline. I am assigned as shepherd for the GFSG review prior to public comment. I read the previous version and will still have to review again the new one and provide my comments. Now, I am slightly puzzled as at a quick glance at V33, there are already a set of valid comments in the document, like missing references etc. I am not sure who made them as my Word does not provide me with author information on these. A simple scan of all comments already in the doc shows some open issues; nothing serious but obviously to be addressed before submitting. Maybe someone could check these comments. Ramin 2007/3/1, Mark Morgan <mmm2a@virginia.edu>:
I uploaded a changed BES draft (we are now on version 33). This draft has the freshly cleansed wsdl and xsd from Rich. As was agreed unanimously on the telecon last week, I believe that this means that we are ready for public comment.
-Mark
-- Mark Morgan Research Scientist Department of Computer Science University of Virginia http://www.cs.virginia.edu mmm2a@virginia.edu (434) 982-2047
-- ogsa-bes-wg mailing list ogsa-bes-wg@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogsa-bes-wg
I got no response for my original email below from March 13th. Could I ask again what the status of this document is? It is currently in GFSG review but I find several comments in it (V33) as a MS Word markup, which are still applicable (e.g. link to a non-existing glossary etc). Could someone confirm: - that this is really the latest version that you wanted to submit. - and the comments have not been resolved (they are marginal editorial things but should still be corrected prior to publication). It would be great if we could get a final version for our GFSG review so that the document can continue its process in the editor pipeline Ramin 2007/3/18, Ramin Yahyapour <ramin.yahyapour@udo.edu>:
Mark,
Stephen was so kind to take care that the doc moved forward in the editor pipeline.
I am assigned as shepherd for the GFSG review prior to public comment. I read the previous version and will still have to review again the new one and provide my comments.
Now, I am slightly puzzled as at a quick glance at V33, there are already a set of valid comments in the document, like missing references etc. I am not sure who made them as my Word does not provide me with author information on these.
A simple scan of all comments already in the doc shows some open issues; nothing serious but obviously to be addressed before submitting. Maybe someone could check these comments.
Ramin
2007/3/1, Mark Morgan <mmm2a@virginia.edu>:
I uploaded a changed BES draft (we are now on version 33). This draft has the freshly cleansed wsdl and xsd from Rich. As was agreed unanimously on the telecon last week, I believe that this means that we are ready for public comment.
-Mark
-- Mark Morgan Research Scientist Department of Computer Science University of Virginia http://www.cs.virginia.edu mmm2a@virginia.edu (434) 982-2047
-- ogsa-bes-wg mailing list ogsa-bes-wg@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogsa-bes-wg
participants (2)
-
Mark Morgan -
Ramin Yahyapour