Pointers on resource management specs
Hi, Here is the list of pointers on resource management specs that I had promised. It's updated from what I posted in may to the OGSA-WG mailing list. - JSIM: the spec (GFD-I.028) is at: https://forge.gridforum.org/projects/ggf-editor/document/GFD.28/en/1 There is also a UML diagram: https://forge.gridforum.org/projects/ogsa-wg/document/JSIM_PDF/en/1 - CIM: the schemas are under: http://www.dmtf.org/standards/cim JSIM is in 2.9.1 preliminary. Try 2.9.0 to get also UML files. - JSDL: the latest snapshot is at: https://forge.gridforum.org/projects/jsdl-wg/document/draft-ggf-jsdl-spec/en... There's a nice introduction at: https://forge.gridforum.org/projects/jsdl-wg/document/JSDL-Introduction/en/ - GLUE 1.1: the schemas are in http://www.cnaf.infn.it/~sergio/datatag/glue/index.htm There's a good presentation on GLUE 1.1: http://www.dma.unina.it/~murli/SummerSchool/presentations/InformationModelin... - GLUE 1.2: the development can be followed in the mailing list archives -- see the "Mailing list (archive)" link in the URL for the GLUE 1.1 schemas above. The latest draft can be found under: http://www.hicb.org/pipermail/glue-schema/2005/frm00057.html There is a very good presentation at: http://infnforge.cnaf.infn.it/cdsagenda//askArchive.php?base=agenda&categ=a056&id=a056s0t1/transparencies Regards, Fred Maciel
I haven't seen minutes to the London meeting, that Andrew says will be discussed on the next call, were they circulated? Also, I think it would be helpful to have some discussion of the issues that I raised in earlier email concerning scope, to which two people replied supportively. Ian.
In the conference call today I offered to propose some ³job management² interfaces for next week¹s BES teleconference. This will be very much based on the document you shared and the discussion on the email list (a judicious amount of cut and paste). I also think that the usefulness of BES will be diminished if I cannot manage jobs themselves. What I propose will be the job management equivalent of the JSDL ³POSIXApplication². -- Chris On 2/6/05 12:51, "Ian Foster" <foster@mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
I haven't seen minutes to the London meeting, that Andrew says will be discussed on the next call, were they circulated?
Also, I think it would be helpful to have some discussion of the issues that I raised in earlier email concerning scope, to which two people replied supportively.
Ian.
Chris: Sounds good. Let me know if I can help or review ... Ian. At 01:38 PM 6/2/2005 -0700, Christopher Smith wrote:
In the conference call today I offered to propose some job managementinterfaces for next weeks BES teleconference. This will be very much based on the document you shared and the discussion on the email list (a judicious amount of cut and paste).
I also think that the usefulness of BES will be diminished if I cannot manage jobs themselves. What I propose will be the job management equivalent of the JSDL POSIXApplication.
-- Chris
On 2/6/05 12:51, "Ian Foster" <foster@mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
I haven't seen minutes to the London meeting, that Andrew says will be discussed on the next call, were they circulated?
Also, I think it would be helpful to have some discussion of the issues that I raised in earlier email concerning scope, to which two people replied supportively.
Ian.
_______________________________________________________________ Ian Foster www.mcs.anl.gov/~foster Math & Computer Science Div. Dept of Computer Science Argonne National Laboratory The University of Chicago Argonne, IL 60439, U.S.A. Chicago, IL 60637, U.S.A. Tel: 630 252 4619 Fax: 630 252 1997 Globus Alliance, www.globus.org
Hi all, London F2F meeting minutes is now available on the GridForge. https://forge.gridforum.org/projects/ogsa-bes-wg/document/minutes20050522/en... Thanks Andrew and Mark! ---- Hiro Kishimoto -----Original Message----- From: owner-ogsa-bes-wg@ggf.org [mailto:owner-ogsa-bes-wg@ggf.org] On Behalf Of Ian Foster Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005 4:51 AM To: Fred Maciel; ogsa-bes-wg@ggf.org Subject: [ogsa-bes-wg] Minutes of London meeting? I haven't seen minutes to the London meeting, that Andrew says will be discussed on the next call, were they circulated? Also, I think it would be helpful to have some discussion of the issues that I raised in earlier email concerning scope, to which two people replied supportively. Ian.
participants (4)
-
Christopher Smith -
Fred Maciel -
Hiro Kishimoto -
Ian Foster