Marvin:
If we are support WS-Transfer, I think that means we need a WS-Transfer
binding for BES?
Ian.
At 05:02 PM 7/15/2006 -0700, Marvin Theimer wrote:
So
to summarize...
----------------
There are four implementation options
that should be supported by the
spec for obtaining public state
data:
1) WS-Transfer,
2) WSRF,
3) public state accessor
operations,
4) basic interop.
An accessor operation for obtaining
the activity status MUST be included
in each of the above implementation
options.
Official QNames SHALL be defined for
options 1-3.
The GetInteropData operation MUST
return a list of QNames that
represents which of the above options
is supported. An empty list
implies that ONLY option #4 is
available.
----------------
We should also define what port types
option #2 implies or break it up
into three different options for each
of the three port types used for
resource property queries in WSRF
(wsrp:GetResourceProperty,
wsrp:GetMultipleResourceProperties,
and wsrp:QueryResourceProperties).
This sounds good to me. I
presume that basic interopmeans just the two accessor operations for
activity status and complete activity infoset?
Marvin.
_______________________________________________________________
Ian Foster, Director, Computation Institute
Argonne National Laboratory & University of Chicago
Argonne: MCS/221, 9700 S. Cass Ave, Argonne, IL 60439
Chicago: Rm 405, 5640 S. Ellis Ave, Chicago, IL 60637
Tel: +1 630 252 4619. Web:
www.ci.uchicago.edu.
Globus Alliance:
www.globus.org.