20 Feb
2008
20 Feb
'08
10:49 p.m.
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 11:23 PM, Steven Newhouse <Steven.Newhouse@microsoft.com> wrote:
By container I mean the web service hosting environment NOT the BES Container. It is therefore not a BES specific fault that gets sent.
Yes, and what I meant was that we have our own hosting environment which happens not to have standard way of throwing SOAP faults in case of an authorization failure. It is up to the service developer to pass the fault to the external interface.
If I'm not authorized to access a WCF service (as an example) the error message I get back as a client is very vague.
OK, that does make sense. Thanks! -- Piotr Domagalski