-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Christopher Smith wrote:
Hi all,
I'm wondering about some of the element types in FactoryResourceAttributesDocumentType. Specifically, should LocalResourceManagerType and NamingProfile be changed to xsd:string? I guess I'm not sure whether to put QNames, or an "expanded name" (I believe it's called).
Should it be:
<NamingProfile xmlns:besnaming="http://schemas.ggf.org/bes/2006/08/bes/naming"> besnaming:BasicWSAddressing </NamingProfile>
or
<NamingProfile> {http://schemas.ggf.org/bes/2006/08/bes/naming}BasicWSAddressing </NamingProfile>
If it's supposed to be the second, then we can't use a QName, since it doesn't fit the proper syntax. I don't think there is an actual default type for expanded name, so xsd:string should suffice.
I saw things like "http://schemas.ggf.org/bes/2006/08/bes/naming#BasicWSAddressing" and having these things called "expanded QNames", if I'm not wrong. However, I would vote for something similar to the first alternative (can't recall now whether <NamingProfile/> is in the besnaming namespace or not) as it leaves you or any tooling the freedom to declare namespaces (like the besnaming) at any place or context where it fits. - -- Michel <dot> Drescher <at> uk <dot> fujitsu <dot> com Fujitsu Laboratories of Europe +44 20 8606 4834 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFQwROk0lMZTNKw4QRAoHLAKCYls+gBvuqgOnnwB80W26uoJXE8gCfWja+ OeBYaBx+KYM0JAMKHVhxyvY= =x1As -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----