Tom Scavo wrote:
On Feb 5, 2008 6:04 PM, Krzysztof Benedyczak <golbi@mat.uni.torun.pl> wrote:
Tom Scavo wrote:
A URL need not be resolvable. SAML, for example, recommends URLs for entityIDs (which are formally required to be URIs). I'm not really sure what SAML authors thought when writing the recommendation you mention: "It is RECOMMENDED that a system entity use a URL containing its own domain name to identify itself."
It is anticipated that SAML entities will eventually publish SAML metadata at the location given by their entityID. Right, so it means it is or is going to be resolvable. But once again - it isn't an important issue anymore.
Before putting changes into working draft, I'd like to hear Valerio's opinion about the format change. What do you think? Best regards, Krzysztof