A reminder that we have a telcon today, at 9am PST / 11am CST / 12am EST / 5pm GMT / 6pm CET / 2am JST / 3am Sydney. I want to go through the community proposals. For each proposal, I suggest we first decide whether it falls under the remit of e-Science, Enterprise, or other. Then I'd like to rate each proposal from 1-5 according to the scale below, ignoring whether we can schedule the event. We should also decide whether the content could be suitable for another type of sessions, e.g. a Group Session, Grid Means Business, or the Developer track. When rating proposals, we should consider the relevance to Grid, the international scope, the quality of the content and the relevance to OGF. Ratings: 1 - Not suitable for OGF. 2 - A session that fails some of the criteria and should only be included if we need to fill slots. 3 - A good session that fits all or most of the criteria; to be included if slots is available. 4 - A good session that fits all the criteria; to be included if possible. 5 - An excellent session that should be included no matter what The dialin details are as before: International dialin: +44 145 254 2309 USA Freephone: 1 866 838 0046 UK number: 0845 245 0224 Australia Freephone: 180 010 9603 Passcode: 275359 Dave Berry Deputy Director, Research & E-infrastructure Development National e-Science Centre, 15 South College Street Edinburgh, EH8 9AA +44 131 651 4039
Hi Dave, Do you really want to do that online in the phone conference? Going online through all the 48 proposals will probably not be very efficient. Also, I doubt many of us had the chance to carefully look into them (at least, I wasn't able to do so, yet). May I propose to do an off-line ranking according to your suggestion in the coming days (say until Friday) and then discuss the ranked results in the PC meeting? Cheers, -- Erwin Dave Berry wrote:
A reminder that we have a telcon today, at 9am PST / 11am CST / 12am EST / 5pm GMT / 6pm CET / 2am JST / 3am Sydney.
I want to go through the community proposals. For each proposal, I suggest we first decide whether it falls under the remit of e-Science, Enterprise, or other. Then I'd like to rate each proposal from 1-5 according to the scale below, ignoring whether we can schedule the event. We should also decide whether the content could be suitable for another type of sessions, e.g. a Group Session, Grid Means Business, or the Developer track.
When rating proposals, we should consider the relevance to Grid, the international scope, the quality of the content and the relevance to OGF.
Ratings: 1 - Not suitable for OGF. 2 - A session that fails some of the criteria and should only be included if we need to fill slots. 3 - A good session that fits all or most of the criteria; to be included if slots is available. 4 - A good session that fits all the criteria; to be included if possible. 5 - An excellent session that should be included no matter what
The dialin details are as before: International dialin: +44 145 254 2309 USA Freephone: 1 866 838 0046 UK number: 0845 245 0224 Australia Freephone: 180 010 9603
Passcode: 275359
Dave Berry Deputy Director, Research & E-infrastructure Development National e-Science Centre, 15 South College Street Edinburgh, EH8 9AA +44 131 651 4039
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ ogf20pc mailing list ogf20pc@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf20pc
participants (2)
-
Dave Berry -
Erwin Laure