Draft outline for industry track
Dear PC, At the last meeting of industry sub-committee I took a task to prepare an outline of the industry track, as we understand it so far, that people could give to potential participants. I have now done this and attach the result. Best wishes, Dave Berry Deputy Director, Research & E-infrastructure Development National e-Science Centre, 15 South College Street Edinburgh, EH8 9AA +44 131 651 4039
Hi Dave, Would you like the output from Laura and my work here at SC about licensing and grids be the starting point for sesson 7? David On 12/11/06 17:30, "Dave Berry" <daveb@nesc.ac.uk> wrote:
Dear PC,
At the last meeting of industry sub-committee I took a task to prepare an outline of the industry track, as we understand it so far, that people could give to potential participants. I have now done this and attach the result.
Best wishes,
Dave Berry Deputy Director, Research & E-infrastructure Development National e-Science Centre, 15 South College Street Edinburgh, EH8 9AA +44 131 651 4039
_______________________________________________ ogf20pc mailing list ogf20pc@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf20pc
-- +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Dr. David Wallom Technical Manager Oxford e-Research Centre University of Oxford c/o OUCS 13 Banbury Road Oxford OX2 6NN Tel : +44 (0)1865 283378 email: david.wallom@oerc.ox.ac.uk PLEASE NOTE THE NEW EMAIL ADDRESS as OERC.OX.AC.UK IERC WILL CONTINUE TO RECEIVE EMAIL FOR THE NEXT FEW MONTHS BUT WILL EVENTUALLY PHASE OUT. PLEASE CHANGE YOUR ADDRESS BOOK APPROPRIATELY +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Dave, This looks ok, but it does leave out the main sessions for the industry track that we had discussed that would be parallel sessions on Tuesday. These would include the sessions from the draft "Straw man OGF20 industry":
Also on Tuesday: Enterprise Requirements workshops These are scheduled to run at the same time as the "Issues in Grids" sessions. We can take advantage of the people attending these workshops to give presentations in other sessions, e.g. in the Collaborative Grids session. 11:00-12:30: Auto & Aerospace industry requirements 16:00-17:30: Pharma industry requirements 18:00-19:30 Requirements roll-up meeting
It would be useful to have the Collaboration Grids session after the Auto and Aerospace industry requirements meeting so that people from the requirements session could present there. Bob Cohen Dave Berry wrote:
Dear PC,
At the last meeting of industry sub-committee I took a task to prepare an outline of the industry track, as we understand it so far, that people could give to potential participants. I have now done this and attach the result.
Best wishes,
Dave Berry Deputy Director, Research & E-infrastructure Development National e-Science Centre, 15 South College Street Edinburgh, EH8 9AA +44 131 651 4039
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ ogf20pc mailing list ogf20pc@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf20pc
I¹m still a little confused with the concept on industry tracks like auto and pharma, etc. I wonder how many businesses new¹ to the grid would be attracted by these sessions. Certainly one or two companies from this segment doing a case study on why the grid is good for their business (with elements that could be applied to other companies not yet doing grid) would be great, I just don¹t understand the value of branding along an industry segment. I think every presentation should make attendees not using grid yet 1) want to come and 2) walk away beleiving 1) this stuff is really adding business value 2) we can use this stuff. ~Brooklin From: Robert Cohen <bcohen@bway.net> Reply-To: <bcohen@bway.net> Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 10:08:00 -0500 To: Dave Berry <daveb@nesc.ac.uk>, <ogf20pc@ogf.org> Subject: Re: [ogf20pc] Draft outline for industry track Dave, This looks ok, but it does leave out the main sessions for the industry track that we had discussed that would be parallel sessions on Tuesday. These would include the sessions from the draft "Straw man OGF20 industry":
Also on Tuesday: Enterprise Requirements workshops These are scheduled to run at the same time as the ³Issues in Grids² sessions. We can take advantage of the people attending these workshops to give presentations in other sessions, e.g. in the Collaborative Grids session. 11:00-12:30: Auto & Aerospace industry requirements 16:00-17:30: Pharma industry requirements 18:00-19:30 Requirements roll-up meeting
It would be useful to have the Collaboration Grids session after the Auto and Aerospace industry requirements meeting so that people from the requirements session could present there. Bob Cohen Dave Berry wrote:
Dear PC,
At the last meeting of industry sub-committee I took a task to prepare an outline of the industry track, as we understand it so far, that people could give to potential participants. I have now done this and attach the result.
Best wishes,
Dave Berry
Deputy Director, Research & E-infrastructure Development
National e-Science Centre, 15 South College Street
Edinburgh, EH8 9AA +44 131 651 4039
_______________________________________________ ogf20pc mailing list ogf20pc@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf20pc
_______________________________________________ ogf20pc mailing list ogf20pc@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf20pc
Dear all, On the local (Manchester) side we are confident that we can get at least one locally based pharma to present. This work involves a local regional Grid so it is a good case study for the use of such resources. I think this work is sufficiently practical to make other similar small bio-pharma startups see how they could apply this in their business today. We will also work with the North West Development Agency to get other local industry along. Areas of industrial strength in the region are pharma, chemical engineering and aerospace. The NWDA funded the North-West Regional Grid and have sent a letter of support for OGF20 so their interest is strong. I am not at SC06 but I will work on getting the above proposals firmed up. Best wishes, John Brooke co-Director e-Science North-West Brooklin Gore wrote:
I’m still a little confused with the concept on industry tracks like auto and pharma, etc. I wonder how many businesses ‘new’ to the grid would be attracted by these sessions. Certainly one or two companies from this segment doing a case study on why the grid is good for their business (with elements that could be applied to other companies not yet doing grid) would be great, I just don’t understand the value of branding along an industry segment.
I think every presentation should make attendees not using grid yet 1) want to come and 2) walk away beleiving 1) this stuff is really adding business value 2) we can use this stuff.
~Brooklin
------------------------------------------------------------------------ *From: *Robert Cohen <bcohen@bway.net> *Reply-To: *<bcohen@bway.net> *Date: *Tue, 14 Nov 2006 10:08:00 -0500 *To: *Dave Berry <daveb@nesc.ac.uk>, <ogf20pc@ogf.org> *Subject: *Re: [ogf20pc] Draft outline for industry track
Dave,
This looks ok, but it does leave out the main sessions for the industry track that we had discussed that would be parallel sessions on Tuesday. These would include the sessions from the draft "Straw man OGF20 industry":
Also on Tuesday: Enterprise Requirements workshops These are scheduled to run at the same time as the “Issues in Grids” sessions. We can take advantage of the people attending these workshops to give presentations in other sessions, e.g. in the Collaborative Grids session. 11:00-12:30: Auto & Aerospace industry requirements 16:00-17:30: Pharma industry requirements 18:00-19:30 Requirements roll-up meeting
It would be useful to have the Collaboration Grids session after the Auto and Aerospace industry requirements meeting so that people from the requirements session could present there.
Bob Cohen
Dave Berry wrote:
Dear PC,
At the last meeting of industry sub-committee I took a task to prepare an outline of the industry track, as we understand it so far, that people could give to potential participants. I have now done this and attach the result.
Best wishes,
Dave Berry
Deputy Director, Research & E-infrastructure Development
National e-Science Centre, 15 South College Street
Edinburgh, EH8 9AA +44 131 651 4039
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ ogf20pc mailing list ogf20pc@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf20pc
------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ ogf20pc mailing list ogf20pc@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf20pc
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ ogf20pc mailing list ogf20pc@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf20pc
Hi Brooklin, I am not sure that you are aware of what the Industry Group was trying to do in Washington at GGF18, but we had two sessions with industry people with extensive experience using Grids. The idea is to get industry oriented users to pinpoint issues they face in using Grids (issues that will probably prove to be similar to what other firms in that industry will face). These issues are to feed into an exercise that is part of promoting greater collaboration between the standards side of OGF and the Enterprise/Science side. Issues from the user side can identify areas where advances in standards would be most helpful to users in industry and science. In the Washington sessions, there was certainly evidence from users that Grids were adding value and could be used at a wide range of firms in the sectors that were part of the discussion. There were also a number of attendees that were relatively new users of Grids. In previous discussions of the OGF20PC, there was no attempt to have the industry sessions be the only sessions available for users to attend. But the idea was to continue the process that was begun in Washington. If many people feel that is not a productive way to move ahead, the entire process should be canned. Bob Cohen Brooklin Gore wrote:
I'm still a little confused with the concept on industry tracks like auto and pharma, etc. I wonder how many businesses 'new' to the grid would be attracted by these sessions. Certainly one or two companies from this segment doing a case study on why the grid is good for their business (with elements that could be applied to other companies not yet doing grid) would be great, I just don't understand the value of branding along an industry segment.
I think every presentation should make attendees not using grid yet 1) want to come and 2) walk away beleiving 1) this stuff is really adding business value 2) we can use this stuff.
~Brooklin
------------------------------------------------------------------------ From: Robert Cohen <bcohen@bway.net> Reply-To: <bcohen@bway.net> Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 10:08:00 -0500 To: Dave Berry <daveb@nesc.ac.uk>, <ogf20pc@ogf.org> Subject: Re: [ogf20pc] Draft outline for industry track
Dave,
This looks ok, but it does leave out the main sessions for the industry track that we had discussed that would be parallel sessions on Tuesday. These would include the sessions from the draft "Straw man OGF20 industry":
Also on Tuesday: Enterprise Requirements workshops These are scheduled to run at the same time as the "Issues in Grids" sessions. We can take advantage of the people attending these workshops to give presentations in other sessions, e.g. in the Collaborative Grids session. 11:00-12:30: Auto & Aerospace industry requirements 16:00-17:30: Pharma industry requirements 18:00-19:30 Requirements roll-up meeting
It would be useful to have the Collaboration Grids session after the Auto and Aerospace industry requirements meeting so that people from the requirements session could present there.
Bob Cohen
Dave Berry wrote:
Dear PC,
At the last meeting of industry sub-committee I took a task to prepare an outline of the industry track, as we understand it so far, that people could give to potential participants. I have now done this and attach the result.
Best wishes,
Dave Berry
Deputy Director, Research & E-infrastructure Development
National e-Science Centre, 15 South College Street
Edinburgh, EH8 9AA +44 131 651 4039
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ ogf20pc mailing list ogf20pc@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf20pc
------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ ogf20pc mailing list ogf20pc@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf20pc
Ok, that is helpful. Also helpful to hear from John Brooke that there is a good concentration of pharma startups in the Manchester area that should be easy to attract to the show. Thanks all, ~Brooklin From: Robert Cohen <bcohen@bway.net> Reply-To: <bcohen@bway.net> Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 12:33:47 -0500 To: Brooklin Gore <bgore@micron.com> Cc: Dave Berry <daveb@nesc.ac.uk>, <ogf20pc@ogf.org> Subject: Re: [ogf20pc] Draft outline for industry track Hi Brooklin, I am not sure that you are aware of what the Industry Group was trying to do in Washington at GGF18, but we had two sessions with industry people with extensive experience using Grids. The idea is to get industry oriented users to pinpoint issues they face in using Grids (issues that will probably prove to be similar to what other firms in that industry will face). These issues are to feed into an exercise that is part of promoting greater collaboration between the standards side of OGF and the Enterprise/Science side. Issues from the user side can identify areas where advances in standards would be most helpful to users in industry and science. In the Washington sessions, there was certainly evidence from users that Grids were adding value and could be used at a wide range of firms in the sectors that were part of the discussion. There were also a number of attendees that were relatively new users of Grids. In previous discussions of the OGF20PC, there was no attempt to have the industry sessions be the only sessions available for users to attend. But the idea was to continue the process that was begun in Washington. If many people feel that is not a productive way to move ahead, the entire process should be canned. Bob Cohen Brooklin Gore wrote:
Re: [ogf20pc] Draft outline for industry track I¹m still a little confused with the concept on industry tracks like auto and pharma, etc. I wonder how many businesses new¹ to the grid would be attracted by these sessions. Certainly one or two companies from this segment doing a case study on why the grid is good for their business (with elements that could be applied to other companies not yet doing grid) would be great, I just don¹t understand the value of branding along an industry segment.
I think every presentation should make attendees not using grid yet 1) want to come and 2) walk away beleiving 1) this stuff is really adding business value 2) we can use this stuff.
~Brooklin
From: Robert Cohen <bcohen@bway.net> <mailto:bcohen@bway.net> Reply-To: <bcohen@bway.net> <mailto:bcohen@bway.net> Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 10:08:00 -0500 To: Dave Berry <daveb@nesc.ac.uk> <mailto:daveb@nesc.ac.uk> , <ogf20pc@ogf.org> <mailto:ogf20pc@ogf.org> Subject: Re: [ogf20pc] Draft outline for industry track
Dave,
This looks ok, but it does leave out the main sessions for the industry track that we had discussed that would be parallel sessions on Tuesday. These would include the sessions from the draft "Straw man OGF20 industry":
Also on Tuesday: Enterprise Requirements workshops These are scheduled to run at the same time as the ³Issues in Grids² sessions. We can take advantage of the people attending these workshops to give presentations in other sessions, e.g. in the Collaborative Grids session. 11:00-12:30: Auto & Aerospace industry requirements 16:00-17:30: Pharma industry requirements 18:00-19:30 Requirements roll-up meeting
It would be useful to have the Collaboration Grids session after the Auto and Aerospace industry requirements meeting so that people from the requirements session could present there.
Bob Cohen
Dave Berry wrote:
Dear PC,
At the last meeting of industry sub-committee I took a task to prepare an outline of the industry track, as we understand it so far, that people could give to potential participants. I have now done this and attach the result.
Best wishes,
Dave Berry
Deputy Director, Research & E-infrastructure Development
National e-Science Centre, 15 South College Street
Edinburgh, EH8 9AA +44 131 651 4039
_______________________________________________ ogf20pc mailing list ogf20pc@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf20pc
_______________________________________________ ogf20pc mailing list ogf20pc@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf20pc
participants (5)
-
Brooklin Gore -
Dave Berry -
David Wallom -
John Brooke -
Robert Cohen