Re: [ogf20pc] OGF20 community submissions for ranking
Hi Stephen, The criteria I suggested before last week's telcon were the relevance to Grid, the international scope, the quality of the content and the relevance to OGF. I'm happy to consider other criteria that people wish to suggest. Best wishes, Dave.
-----Original Message----- From: Stephen M Pickles [mailto:Stephen.Pickles@manchester.ac.uk] Sent: 19 February 2007 13:53 To: Dave Berry; ogf20pc@ogf.org Subject: RE: [ogf20pc] OGF20 community submissions for ranking
Dave,
Is there a definitive list of criteria against which these proposals should be ranked?
Stephen
________________________________
From: ogf20pc-bounces@ogf.org [mailto:ogf20pc-bounces@ogf.org] On Behalf Of Dave Berry Sent: 15 February 2007 12:41 To: ogf20pc@ogf.org Subject: [ogf20pc] OGF20 community submissions for ranking
Dear PC,
Please find attached a spreadsheet that summarises the proposals received via the CFP. Our immediate task is to rank the submissions on the first sheet, which lists the workshop proposals. As discussed, please use the following ranking:
1 - Not suitable for OGF. 2 - A session that fails some of the criteria and should only be included if we need to fill slots. 3 - A good session that fits all or most of the criteria; to be included if slots is available. 4 - A good session that fits all the criteria; to be included if possible. 5 - An excellent session that should be included no matter what
Do add comments where appropriate, e.g. if you wish to recommend merging with another session, or accepting with fewer sessions.
Please mail your rankings to me and I will summarise. We will discuss the results on next Tuesday's call.
Note: non-workshop proposals have been moved to the other sheets - Enterprise sessions, Grid Means Business, and Other. Please note that these sheets do not show the complete line-up for these tracks; only those submitted via the CFP.
Best wishes,
Dave Berry Deputy Director, Research & E-infrastructure Development National e-Science Centre, 15 South College Street Edinburgh, EH8 9AA +44 131 651 4039
Dear Dave, all: I am on the road and couldn't edit directly and email the Excel attachment. So, i append my ratings and comments below: old good plain text! best wishes =================================================================== Rizos Sakellariou, PhD email: rizos@cs.man.ac.uk School of Computer Science Tel: +44-161-2756257 University of Manchester Fax: +44-161-2756204 Manchester M13 9PL, U.K. http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~rizos =================================================================== ================================================================ Experiences Developing Health Grids in the UK Rating: 3 I would be prepared to give a rating of 4, if the proposal involved participation of non-UK international projects as well. ================================================================ Infrastructure for Highly Interactive and Computational Steering Applications Rating: 1 I am not sure, but i don't know on what experiences the presenters will draw upon. Since Nazir appears to be a research student, i wonder whether what will be included in the session will be much more than a PhD project presentation. ================================================================ Dynamic Service Level Agreements Rating: 4.5 Interesting, focussed proposal on a "hot" topic, good interaction with GRAAP. ================================================================ OMII-Europe - an Overview Rating: 4 Although the details of the presentation are not yet confirmed (according to the proposal), i think this is a good match with the criteria set. ================================================================ Full Economic Costing of Condor Pools Rating: 2 There is only UK interest here... ================================================================ Rapid Application Deployment on Condor Pools Rating: 2? It is not clear, but according to the summary it looks like the request is only for a 30 minute presentation... ================================================================ eArts and eHumanities - eScience technologies and methodologies in Arts and Humanities research Rating: 4.5 An interesting topic, however, i would like to see more involvement. At the moment it looks like it is only two sides: the TextGrid project and the AHeSSC. More involvement would justify 2 sessions, otherwise, this might be a candidate to reduce to 1. However, i think this proposal relates to a very interesting and timely topic, that should be accepted. ================================================================= e-Science Themes at the e-Science Institute Rating: 3.5 Although the theme is appropriate, i wonder whether it justifies a workshop session... ================================================================= NextGRID Architecture Workshop Rating: 5 Certainly, a 16M euro Grid project, with large industrial involvement, at its final year, will have something to say! The agenda looks fine. ================================================================= GridWay Metascheduler Rating: 3.5 I am not very familiar with GridWay, however, there appears to be some activity. I would have given a higher rating if the presentations from selected use cases (item 3) in the agenda, could be confirmed. ================================================================= Evolutions of GRIDs Towards Service Oriented Knowledge Utilities (SOKUs) Rating: 3 For sure, it is difficult to justify a 4 session workshop, especially, if the "detailed programme has not yet been decided and the speakers have not been verified". In addition, the agenda seems to be a mix of different things - doesn't seem to match the title and it probably needs to be more coherent. My suggestion, if the proposers agree, would be to offer one session (following the same argument that i made for NextGrid), to illustrate CoreGrid experiences and vision. ================================================================== Computational steering on the Grid Rating: 5 Good focussed proposal, international involvement, certainly of interest. ================================================================== Service Level Agreements in Grids Rating: 3.5 Certainly of interest, however, i would have liked to see more in the agenda about presentations, to give a higher rating. It might be worth thinking about a possibly merged, 3-session workshop with the dynamic SLAs topic... ================================================================== The Astronomical Virtual Observatory - Building Operational Services on Pervasive Grids: Standards in Use Rating: 4.5 An excellent proposal, for sure it makes a serious attempt to justify the need for 5 sessions, very good involvement. It looks to me as if everything could fit in 3-4 sessions. ================================================================== 2nd International Campus Grids Workshop: Continuing Interoperability Rating: 3? I am a bit unsure about this... ================================================================== Community Workshop: Experiences of using OGSA-DAI Rating: 3 There is nothing wrong here, but the topic might be limited in scope... ================================================================== Health-e Child Rating: 1 Not enough information. I'd suggest to absorb this into the very first proposal... ================================================================== Adoption of Grid Technologies in Astronomic Science Rating: ? This doesn't seem to be available from the web link. I seem to recall there was a separate attachment, but i can't find it at the moment... ==================================================================
participants (2)
-
Dave Berry -
Rizos Sakellariou