Hi Erwin,

There are fewer than 48 proposals, as some proposals requested more than
one session.  

I realise that we won't be able to consider every proposal in detail but
I would like to briefly consider each one, seeing in which track they
would best fit.  I agree that a more detailed consideration will have to
take place off-line.

I would also like to see whether we want to respond to some proposers
with alternative possibilities.  E.g. for some, we might ask whether
they would consider running in fewer sessions.  For others, we might
suggest they are more appropriate as group sessions, or that they give a
presentation in the Grids Mean Business track instead of running in a
separate session.

Best wishes,

Dave.


  

-----Original Message-----
From: Erwin Laure [mailto:Erwin.Laure@cern.ch] 
Sent: 13 February 2007 14:47
To: Dave Berry
Cc: ogf20pc@ogf.org
Subject: Re: [ogf20pc] Today's telcon

Hi Dave,

Do you really want to do that online in the phone conference? Going 
online through all the 48 proposals will probably not be very 
efficient. 
Also, I doubt many of us had the chance to carefully look 
into them (at 
least, I wasn't able to do so, yet).

May I propose to do an off-line ranking according to your 
suggestion in 
the coming days (say until Friday) and then discuss the 
ranked results 
in the PC meeting?

Cheers,

-- Erwin

Dave Berry wrote:
    

A reminder that we have a telcon today, at 9am PST / 11am 
      

CST / 12am EST 
    

/ 5pm GMT / 6pm CET / 2am JST / 3am Sydney.
 
I want to go through the community proposals.  For each proposal, I 
suggest we first decide whether it falls under the remit of 
      

e-Science, 
    

Enterprise, or other.  Then I'd like to rate each proposal from 1-5 
according to the scale below, ignoring whether we can schedule the 
event.  We should also decide whether the content could be 
      

suitable for 
    

another type of sessions, e.g. a Group Session, Grid Means 
      

Business, or 
    

the Developer track.
 
When rating proposals, we should consider the relevance to 
      

Grid, the 
    

international scope, the quality of the content and the 
      

relevance to OGF.
    

 
Ratings:
1 - Not suitable for OGF.
2 - A session that fails some of the criteria and should only be 
included if we need to fill slots.
3 - A good session that fits all or most of the criteria; 
      

to be included 
    

if slots is available.
4 - A good session that fits all the criteria; to be 
      

included if possible.
    

5 - An excellent session that should be included no matter what
 
The dialin details are as before:
International dialin: +44 145 254 2309
USA Freephone: 1 866 838 0046
UK number: 0845 245 0224
Australia Freephone: 180 010 9603

Passcode: 275359

Dave Berry
Deputy Director, Research & E-infrastructure Development
National e-Science Centre, 15 South College Street
Edinburgh, EH8 9AA                  +44 131 651 4039
 



      

--------------------------------------------------------------
----------
    

_______________________________________________
ogf20pc mailing list
ogf20pc@ogf.org
http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf20pc
      

_______________________________________________
ogf20pc mailing list
ogf20pc@ogf.org
http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf20pc

  

-- 
:
: Geoffrey Fox  gcf@indiana.edu FAX 8128567972 http://www.infomall.org
: Phones Cell 812-219-4643 Home 8123239196 Lab 8128567977
: SkypeIn 812-669-0772 with voicemail, International cell 8123910207