You are correct of course! There just happen to be different mechanisms
for "community program" (introduced in GGF14) and group business
sessions (introduced in beginning of time). This distinction is
highlighted for OGF 20 as there are not many sessions for community
program but partly as they can be offered thursday and friday, less
pressure on group sessions
Malcolm Atkinson wrote:
Re: [ogf20pc] Today's telcon
My
understanding Geoffrey was that any activity aimed at developing and
sustaining a grid community was and is an activity in a community
programme. I find it hard to understand the distinction between a
meeting of a community group which is, at least in part, trying fulfil
that obligation and a meeting in the “community programme”. I agree
that ET-CG has plenty of flexibility about when it meets, compared with
some other activities that you wish to cluster. The value of including
some of the *-CG activities within the cluster of your community
programme should be considered.
I still find it a complete semantic mystery how the phrase “community
programme” doesn’t include the meetings of the community groups.
But no problems now <((-:}
Malcolm
On 13/2/07 17:12, "Geoffrey Fox" <gcf@grids.ucs.indiana.edu>
wrote:
I apologize that ice storm here has made it
impossible for me to attend telecon
Proposed strategy looks good!
I did communicate with IVOA and they indicated that they could even
prefer OGF21 to OGF20
I suggested ET-CG switch to group sessions
The community program is aimed at significant mini-workshops rather
than individual presentations or other 90 minute events that can be
done by group mechanism. I would prefer a few good "significant"
projects be chosen rather than many small ones
Dave Berry wrote:
Hi Erwin,
There are fewer than 48 proposals, as some proposals requested more than
one session.
I realise that we won't be able to consider every proposal in detail but
I would like to briefly consider each one, seeing in which track they
would best fit. I agree that a more detailed consideration will have to
take place off-line.
I would also like to see whether we want to respond to some proposers
with alternative possibilities. E.g. for some, we might ask whether
they would consider running in fewer sessions. For others, we might
suggest they are more appropriate as group sessions, or that they give a
presentation in the Grids Mean Business track instead of running in a
separate session.
Best wishes,
Dave.
-----Original Message-----
From: Erwin Laure [mailto:Erwin.Laure@cern.ch]
Sent: 13 February 2007 14:47
To: Dave Berry
Cc: ogf20pc@ogf.org
Subject: Re: [ogf20pc] Today's telcon
Hi Dave,
Do you really want to do that online in the phone conference? Going
online through all the 48 proposals will probably not be very
efficient.
Also, I doubt many of us had the chance to carefully look
into them (at
least, I wasn't able to do so, yet).
May I propose to do an off-line ranking according to your
suggestion in
the coming days (say until Friday) and then discuss the
ranked results
in the PC meeting?
Cheers,
-- Erwin
Dave Berry wrote:
A reminder that we have a telcon today, at 9am PST / 11am
CST / 12am EST
/ 5pm GMT / 6pm CET / 2am JST / 3am Sydney.
I want to go through the community proposals. For each proposal, I
suggest we first decide whether it falls under the remit of
e-Science,
Enterprise, or other. Then I'd like to rate each proposal from 1-5
according to the scale below, ignoring whether we can schedule the
event. We should also decide whether the content could be
suitable for
another type of sessions, e.g. a Group Session, Grid Means
Business, or
the Developer track.
When rating proposals, we should consider the relevance to
Grid, the
international scope, the quality of the content and the
relevance to OGF.
Ratings:
1 - Not suitable for OGF.
2 - A session that fails some of the criteria and should only be
included if we need to fill slots.
3 - A good session that fits all or most of the criteria;
to be included
if slots is available.
4 - A good session that fits all the criteria; to be
included if possible.
5 - An excellent session that should be included no matter what
The dialin details are as before:
International dialin: +44 145 254 2309
USA Freephone: 1 866 838 0046
UK number: 0845 245 0224
Australia Freephone: 180 010 9603
Passcode: 275359
Dave Berry
Deputy Director, Research & E-infrastructure Development
National e-Science Centre, 15 South College Street
Edinburgh, EH8 9AA +44 131 651 4039
--------------------------------------------------------------
----------
_______________________________________________
ogf20pc mailing list
ogf20pc@ogf.org
http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf20pc
_______________________________________________
ogf20pc mailing list
ogf20pc@ogf.org
http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf20pc
--
:
: Geoffrey Fox gcf@indiana.edu FAX 8128567972 http://www.infomall.org
: Phones Cell 812-219-4643 Home 8123239196 Lab 8128567977
: SkypeIn 812-669-0772 with voicemail, International cell 8123910207