I am writing a column for IEEE Cloud Computing on standards useful in IoT, and would appreciate any and all input. Please feel to write to me individually with any questions or suggestions. OCCI obviously has applicability here, but I would be interested beyond this in any ongoing work. Thanks, Alan
Hi Alan, I am aware of people using WS-Agreement in the domain of IoT. And Jens mentioned that ATOS intends to useWS-Agreement in a joint IoT project. Would this be interesting? Best regards Wolfgang -- Wolfgang Ziegler www.scai.fraunhofer.de/ziegler.html Fraunhofer Institute for Algorithms and Scientific Computing (SCAI) Schloss Birlinghoven, D-53754 Sankt Augustin, Germany Tel: +49 2241 14 2258; Fax: +49 2241 14 42258 SmartLM - Software License Technology for Grids, Clouds, SOA: www.smartlm.eu CoreGRID Network of Excellence. www.coregrid.eu
Am 10.02.2017 um 16:35 schrieb Sill, Alan <alan.sill@ttu.edu>:
I am writing a column for IEEE Cloud Computing on standards useful in IoT, and would appreciate any and all input. Please feel to write to me individually with any questions or suggestions.
OCCI obviously has applicability here, but I would be interested beyond this in any ongoing work.
Thanks, Alan _______________________________________________ occi-wg mailing list occi-wg@ogf.org https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg
Very interesting. You also mentioned a summary of IoT-related standards that you had seen, though I forgot in what cont3ext that had been assembled. Is there a link to that somewhere? I may have missed it... Alan
On Feb 10, 2017, at 10:54 AM, Wolfgang Ziegler <wolfgang.ziegler@scai.fraunhofer.de> wrote:
Hi Alan,
I am aware of people using WS-Agreement in the domain of IoT. And Jens mentioned that ATOS intends to useWS-Agreement in a joint IoT project. Would this be interesting?
Best regards
Wolfgang
-- Wolfgang Ziegler www.scai.fraunhofer.de/ziegler.html Fraunhofer Institute for Algorithms and Scientific Computing (SCAI) Schloss Birlinghoven, D-53754 Sankt Augustin, Germany Tel: +49 2241 14 2258; Fax: +49 2241 14 42258
SmartLM - Software License Technology for Grids, Clouds, SOA: www.smartlm.eu
CoreGRID Network of Excellence. www.coregrid.eu
Am 10.02.2017 um 16:35 schrieb Sill, Alan <alan.sill@ttu.edu>:
I am writing a column for IEEE Cloud Computing on standards useful in IoT, and would appreciate any and all input. Please feel to write to me individually with any questions or suggestions.
OCCI obviously has applicability here, but I would be interested beyond this in any ongoing work.
Thanks, Alan _______________________________________________ occi-wg mailing list occi-wg@ogf.org https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg
Please take me off this email thread Sent from my iPad
On Feb 10, 2017, at 11:54 AM, Wolfgang Ziegler <wolfgang.ziegler@scai.fraunhofer.de> wrote:
Hi Alan,
I am aware of people using WS-Agreement in the domain of IoT. And Jens mentioned that ATOS intends to useWS-Agreement in a joint IoT project. Would this be interesting?
Best regards
Wolfgang
-- Wolfgang Ziegler www.scai.fraunhofer.de/ziegler.html Fraunhofer Institute for Algorithms and Scientific Computing (SCAI) Schloss Birlinghoven, D-53754 Sankt Augustin, Germany Tel: +49 2241 14 2258; Fax: +49 2241 14 42258
SmartLM - Software License Technology for Grids, Clouds, SOA: www.smartlm.eu
CoreGRID Network of Excellence. www.coregrid.eu
Am 10.02.2017 um 16:35 schrieb Sill, Alan <alan.sill@ttu.edu>:
I am writing a column for IEEE Cloud Computing on standards useful in IoT, and would appreciate any and all input. Please feel to write to me individually with any questions or suggestions.
OCCI obviously has applicability here, but I would be interested beyond this in any ongoing work.
Thanks, Alan _______________________________________________ occi-wg mailing list occi-wg@ogf.org https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg
_______________________________________________ occi-wg mailing list occi-wg@ogf.org https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg
Alan: I have posted a set of slides on IoT standards and open source initiatives with many reference links at http://www.slideshare.net/bobmarcus/standards-and-open-source-for-big-data-c... <http://www.slideshare.net/bobmarcus/standards-and-open-source-for-big-data-cloud-and-iot> Bob Marcus ============================================================
On Feb 10, 2017, at 8:35 AM, Sill, Alan <alan.sill@ttu.edu> wrote:
I am writing a column for IEEE Cloud Computing on standards useful in IoT, and would appreciate any and all input. Please feel to write to me individually with any questions or suggestions.
OCCI obviously has applicability here, but I would be interested beyond this in any ongoing work.
Thanks, Alan _______________________________________________ occi-wg mailing list occi-wg@ogf.org https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg
Bob, Thanks very much! Alan On Feb 10, 2017, at 11:31 AM, Bob Marcus <bobmarcus1@comcast.net<mailto:bobmarcus1@comcast.net>> wrote: Alan: I have posted a set of slides on IoT standards and open source initiatives with many reference links at http://www.slideshare.net/bobmarcus/standards-and-open-source-for-big-data-c... Bob Marcus ============================================================ On Feb 10, 2017, at 8:35 AM, Sill, Alan <alan.sill@ttu.edu<mailto:alan.sill@ttu.edu>> wrote: I am writing a column for IEEE Cloud Computing on standards useful in IoT, and would appreciate any and all input. Please feel to write to me individually with any questions or suggestions. OCCI obviously has applicability here, but I would be interested beyond this in any ongoing work. Thanks, Alan _______________________________________________ occi-wg mailing list occi-wg@ogf.org<mailto:occi-wg@ogf.org> https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg
Hi Alan, all, Last months, we coached a student project on applying OCCI to control mobile robots (a kind of IoT). Each robot is reflected by an OCCI resource with a new OCCI kind. These OCCI resources are hosted by our generic OCCIware server. The implementation of the new kinds is a bridge from OCCI to network protocols to interact with mobile robots. Three kinds of robots are currently supported: Lego Mindstorm, AR Drone and TurtleBot 2. In brief, OCCI can be experimentally used to model mobile robots as resource. One of next steps will be to embed the OCCI server directly inside mobile robots, e.g., our TurtleBot 2 embeds a portable computer, Raspberry PI could be the computer of a mobile robot. Another big step could be to define an OCCI extension, which clearly standardizes a set of kinds and mixins related to IoT. A+ Philippe Le 10/02/2017 à 16:35, Sill, Alan a écrit :
I am writing a column for IEEE Cloud Computing on standards useful in IoT, and would appreciate any and all input. Please feel to write to me individually with any questions or suggestions.
OCCI obviously has applicability here, but I would be interested beyond this in any ongoing work.
Thanks, Alan _______________________________________________ occi-wg mailing list occi-wg@ogf.org https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg
-- Philippe Merle Inria researcher http://chercheurs.lille.inria.fr/~pmerle/
Very interesting, thanks. Do you have a reference for this set of work? (publication, conference presentation, etc.) That would be helpful. Alan
On Feb 10, 2017, at 12:10 PM, Philippe Merle <philippe.merle@inria.fr> wrote:
Hi Alan, all,
Last months, we coached a student project on applying OCCI to control mobile robots (a kind of IoT). Each robot is reflected by an OCCI resource with a new OCCI kind. These OCCI resources are hosted by our generic OCCIware server. The implementation of the new kinds is a bridge from OCCI to network protocols to interact with mobile robots. Three kinds of robots are currently supported: Lego Mindstorm, AR Drone and TurtleBot 2.
In brief, OCCI can be experimentally used to model mobile robots as resource.
One of next steps will be to embed the OCCI server directly inside mobile robots, e.g., our TurtleBot 2 embeds a portable computer, Raspberry PI could be the computer of a mobile robot.
Another big step could be to define an OCCI extension, which clearly standardizes a set of kinds and mixins related to IoT.
A+ Philippe
Le 10/02/2017 à 16:35, Sill, Alan a écrit :
I am writing a column for IEEE Cloud Computing on standards useful in IoT, and would appreciate any and all input. Please feel to write to me individually with any questions or suggestions.
OCCI obviously has applicability here, but I would be interested beyond this in any ongoing work.
Thanks, Alan _______________________________________________ occi-wg mailing list occi-wg@ogf.org https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg
-- Philippe Merle Inria researcher http://chercheurs.lille.inria.fr/~pmerle/
_______________________________________________ occi-wg mailing list occi-wg@ogf.org https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg
Very interesting, thanks. Do you have a reference for this set of work? (publication, conference presentation, etc.) That would be helpful. Currently, this work is not published as the students just completed
Hi Alan, Le 10/02/2017 à 20:24, Sill, Alan a écrit : their project. Their developments are available into a github repository. They wrote a project thesis but it is in French :-( Next step will be to publish this work. Don't hesitate to contact me directly for more information. A+ Philippe
Alan
On Feb 10, 2017, at 12:10 PM, Philippe Merle <philippe.merle@inria.fr> wrote:
Hi Alan, all,
Last months, we coached a student project on applying OCCI to control mobile robots (a kind of IoT). Each robot is reflected by an OCCI resource with a new OCCI kind. These OCCI resources are hosted by our generic OCCIware server. The implementation of the new kinds is a bridge from OCCI to network protocols to interact with mobile robots. Three kinds of robots are currently supported: Lego Mindstorm, AR Drone and TurtleBot 2.
In brief, OCCI can be experimentally used to model mobile robots as resource.
One of next steps will be to embed the OCCI server directly inside mobile robots, e.g., our TurtleBot 2 embeds a portable computer, Raspberry PI could be the computer of a mobile robot.
Another big step could be to define an OCCI extension, which clearly standardizes a set of kinds and mixins related to IoT.
A+ Philippe
Le 10/02/2017 à 16:35, Sill, Alan a écrit :
I am writing a column for IEEE Cloud Computing on standards useful in IoT, and would appreciate any and all input. Please feel to write to me individually with any questions or suggestions.
OCCI obviously has applicability here, but I would be interested beyond this in any ongoing work.
Thanks, Alan _______________________________________________ occi-wg mailing list occi-wg@ogf.org https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg -- Philippe Merle Inria researcher http://chercheurs.lille.inria.fr/~pmerle/
_______________________________________________ occi-wg mailing list occi-wg@ogf.org https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg
-- Philippe Merle Inria researcher http://chercheurs.lille.inria.fr/~pmerle/
I currently have a paper on the subject submitted to IEEE IoT: still waiting for the review, submitted in October. In a nutshell, I use the monitoring extension to describe the infrastructure, with emphasis on edge computing and the utilization of websockets (you know, the channels in the monitoring extension) for communication. I can share with you the draft, if you are interested in. 2017-02-10 16:35 GMT+01:00 Sill, Alan <alan.sill@ttu.edu>:
I am writing a column for IEEE Cloud Computing on standards useful in IoT, and would appreciate any and all input. Please feel to write to me individually with any questions or suggestions.
OCCI obviously has applicability here, but I would be interested beyond this in any ongoing work.
Thanks, Alan _______________________________________________ occi-wg mailing list occi-wg@ogf.org https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg
-- Augusto Ciuffoletti Dipartimento di Informatica Università di Pisa 56100 - Pisa (Italy)
HI, Yes, please do! Any other references to published work or work in progress would be appreciated. In addition to the IEEE CC column that I mentioned, OGF is in the process of preparing a statement to ISO in response to their request for information on IoT-relevant standards. The timescale for this response is quite short, but responses received after this time can be conveyed in person by Wolfgang Ziegler, who will be attending the next ISO SC38 meeting on our behalf. Thanks! Alan On Feb 11, 2017, at 4:37 AM, Augusto Ciuffoletti <augusto@di.unipi.it<mailto:augusto@di.unipi.it>> wrote: I currently have a paper on the subject submitted to IEEE IoT: still waiting for the review, submitted in October. In a nutshell, I use the monitoring extension to describe the infrastructure, with emphasis on edge computing and the utilization of websockets (you know, the channels in the monitoring extension) for communication. I can share with you the draft, if you are interested in. 2017-02-10 16:35 GMT+01:00 Sill, Alan <alan.sill@ttu.edu<mailto:alan.sill@ttu.edu>>: I am writing a column for IEEE Cloud Computing on standards useful in IoT, and would appreciate any and all input. Please feel to write to me individually with any questions or suggestions. OCCI obviously has applicability here, but I would be interested beyond this in any ongoing work. Thanks, Alan _______________________________________________ occi-wg mailing list occi-wg@ogf.org<mailto:occi-wg@ogf.org> https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg -- Augusto Ciuffoletti Dipartimento di Informatica Università di Pisa 56100 - Pisa (Italy)
I'm happy to announce that the OCCI-IoT paper has been finally accepted and is now available on ieee-xplore (https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2017.2734068) and upon request. In a nutshell, the paper introduces an OCCI extension to configure and manage a multilayer IoT infrastructure made of sensors and aggregators. It is strongly related with OCCI-monitoring, but the terminology is different to adhere to an IEEE recommendation. A working example gives an "hands on" idea of how it works. I consider to proceed further on this way, since the extension is not formally stated, and I'd like to have a convincing design/prototype of the engine. If anybody in this group wants to discuss about this in person, I'll be at the WiMob conference in Rome to present a (IoT but otherwise unrelated) paper. In addition, I'd like to encourage an OCCI informal meeting: we have new results (consider also the robots in France, and maybe others I do not know about) that confirm the value of the current release of the proposed standard, and it would be interesting to meet and discuss them. If there is an interest on that, please send a 'like'. I'll be happy to host an unconference event in Pisa. Bye Augusto 2017-02-11 11:37 GMT+01:00 Augusto Ciuffoletti <augusto@di.unipi.it>:
I currently have a paper on the subject submitted to IEEE IoT: still waiting for the review, submitted in October. In a nutshell, I use the monitoring extension to describe the infrastructure, with emphasis on edge computing and the utilization of websockets (you know, the channels in the monitoring extension) for communication.
I can share with you the draft, if you are interested in.
2017-02-10 16:35 GMT+01:00 Sill, Alan <alan.sill@ttu.edu>:
I am writing a column for IEEE Cloud Computing on standards useful in IoT, and would appreciate any and all input. Please feel to write to me individually with any questions or suggestions.
OCCI obviously has applicability here, but I would be interested beyond this in any ongoing work.
Thanks, Alan _______________________________________________ occi-wg mailing list occi-wg@ogf.org https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg
-- Augusto Ciuffoletti Dipartimento di Informatica Università di Pisa 56100 - Pisa (Italy)
-- Augusto Ciuffoletti Dipartimento di Informatica Università di Pisa 56100 - Pisa (Italy)
participants (6)
-
Augusto Ciuffoletti -
Bob Marcus -
Elizabeth Roberts -
Philippe Merle -
Sill, Alan -
Wolfgang Ziegler