What next next on the apis ?
Hi Since there's been so much feedback on the cloud model/responsibilities and the network attributes matrix, I was thinking about the next analysis. should it be storage, cpu/mem. or ancillary ? -gary
IMHO, compute might be the next step and then storage. Cheers <k/> |-----Original Message----- |From: occi-wg-bounces@ogf.org [mailto:occi-wg-bounces@ogf.org] On Behalf |Of Gary Mazz |Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 1:24 PM |To: Edmonds, AndrewX; occi-wg@ogf.org |Subject: [occi-wg] What next next on the apis ? | |Hi | |Since there's been so much feedback on the cloud model/responsibilities |and the network attributes matrix, I was thinking about the next |analysis. should it be storage, cpu/mem. or ancillary ? | |-gary |_______________________________________________ |occi-wg mailing list |occi-wg@ogf.org |http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg
Thanks... Ancillary: 0 Computer : 1 Storage : 0 ============== Total : 1 Krishna Sankar (ksankar) wrote:
IMHO, compute might be the next step and then storage. Cheers <k/>
|-----Original Message----- |From: occi-wg-bounces@ogf.org [mailto:occi-wg-bounces@ogf.org] On Behalf |Of Gary Mazz |Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 1:24 PM |To: Edmonds, AndrewX; occi-wg@ogf.org |Subject: [occi-wg] What next next on the apis ? | |Hi | |Since there's been so much feedback on the cloud model/responsibilities |and the network attributes matrix, I was thinking about the next |analysis. should it be storage, cpu/mem. or ancillary ? | |-gary |_______________________________________________ |occi-wg mailing list |occi-wg@ogf.org |http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg
With regard to compute....Perhaps something akin to BES, with support for a very simple RESTful interface which creates RESTful resources for each request that can then be statuses, etc. I'd be happy to help writing up a use case. Krishna Sankar (ksankar) wrote:
IMHO, compute might be the next step and then storage. Cheers <k/>
|-----Original Message----- |From: occi-wg-bounces@ogf.org [mailto:occi-wg-bounces@ogf.org] On Behalf |Of Gary Mazz |Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 1:24 PM |To: Edmonds, AndrewX; occi-wg@ogf.org |Subject: [occi-wg] What next next on the apis ? | |Hi | |Since there's been so much feedback on the cloud model/responsibilities |and the network attributes matrix, I was thinking about the next |analysis. should it be storage, cpu/mem. or ancillary ? | |-gary |_______________________________________________ |occi-wg mailing list |occi-wg@ogf.org |http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg _______________________________________________ occi-wg mailing list occi-wg@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg
-- Michael Behrens R2AD, LLC (571) 594-3008 (cell) (703) 714-0442 (land)
Hi Michael, Right now I'm aggregating the attributes of several provider apis into matrices, so we quick visual on the synergies. Its a step before producing a "BES like" specification. If you would like to review the network attributes, they can be found @ http://forge.gridforum.org/sf/wiki/do/viewPage/projects.occi-wg/wiki/CookedN... an html page of the matrix found @ http://forge.gridforum.org/sf/wiki/do/viewAttachment/projects.occi-wg/wiki/C... If you join the group, you can add the use case to the wiki You can join gridforge here: http://forge.gridforum.org/sf/sfmain/do/home then join occi-wg. One of the group admins/coordinators can add you as an editor. -gary Michael Behrens wrote:
With regard to compute....Perhaps something akin to BES, with support for a very simple RESTful interface which creates RESTful resources for each request that can then be statuses, etc. I'd be happy to help writing up a use case.
Krishna Sankar (ksankar) wrote:
IMHO, compute might be the next step and then storage. Cheers <k/>
|-----Original Message----- |From: occi-wg-bounces@ogf.org [mailto:occi-wg-bounces@ogf.org] On Behalf |Of Gary Mazz |Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 1:24 PM |To: Edmonds, AndrewX; occi-wg@ogf.org |Subject: [occi-wg] What next next on the apis ? | |Hi | |Since there's been so much feedback on the cloud model/responsibilities |and the network attributes matrix, I was thinking about the next |analysis. should it be storage, cpu/mem. or ancillary ? | |-gary |_______________________________________________ |occi-wg mailing list |occi-wg@ogf.org |http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg _______________________________________________ occi-wg mailing list occi-wg@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg
Michael, Thanks for your contribution - certainly additional use cases from you would be hugely appreciated. If you do have them please place them here [1] and if you have time integrate them here [2], otherwise I can do that. Cheers! Andy [1] http://forge.ogf.org/sf/wiki/do/viewPage/projects.occi-wg/wiki/UseCases [2] http://forge.ogf.org/sf/wiki/do/viewPage/projects.occi-wg/wiki/Requirements -----Original Message----- From: Michael Behrens [mailto:michael.behrens@r2ad.com] Sent: 11 June 2009 03:03 To: Krishna Sankar (ksankar) Cc: Gary Mazz; Edmonds, AndrewX; occi-wg@ogf.org Subject: Re: [occi-wg] What next on the apis ? With regard to compute....Perhaps something akin to BES, with support for a very simple RESTful interface which creates RESTful resources for each request that can then be statuses, etc. I'd be happy to help writing up a use case. Krishna Sankar (ksankar) wrote:
IMHO, compute might be the next step and then storage. Cheers <k/>
|-----Original Message----- |From: occi-wg-bounces@ogf.org [mailto:occi-wg-bounces@ogf.org] On Behalf |Of Gary Mazz |Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 1:24 PM |To: Edmonds, AndrewX; occi-wg@ogf.org |Subject: [occi-wg] What next next on the apis ? | |Hi | |Since there's been so much feedback on the cloud model/responsibilities |and the network attributes matrix, I was thinking about the next |analysis. should it be storage, cpu/mem. or ancillary ? | |-gary |_______________________________________________ |occi-wg mailing list |occi-wg@ogf.org |http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg _______________________________________________ occi-wg mailing list occi-wg@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg
-- Michael Behrens R2AD, LLC (571) 594-3008 (cell) (703) 714-0442 (land) ------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Ireland Limited (Branch) Collinstown Industrial Park, Leixlip, County Kildare, Ireland Registered Number: E902934 This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
participants (4)
-
Edmonds, AndrewX -
Gary Mazz -
Krishna Sankar (ksankar) -
Michael Behrens